Bibliography for LL1001: Public Law BETA

Ahmed, F. and Perry, A. (2014) ‘The Coherence of the Doctrine of Legitimate Expectations’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 73(1), pp. 61–85. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197314000026.

Ahmed, F. and Perry, A. (2016) ‘Constitutional Statutes’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies [Preprint]. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqw030.

Alder, J. and Syrett, K. (2017a) Constitutional and Administrative Law. 11th Edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Alder, J. and Syrett, K. (2017b) ‘The Rule of Law’, in Constitutional and Administrative Law. 11th Edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 121–137.

Alder, J. and Syrett, K. (2017c) ‘Underlying Politcal Traditions’, in Constitutional and Administrative Law. 11th Edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 26–54.

Ali v United Kingdom: Article 6(1) ECHR and Administrative Decision-Making | Public Law for Everyone (no date). Available at: https://publiclawforeveryone.com/2016/03/13/ali-v-united-kingdom-article-61-echr-and-administrative-decision-making/.

Allan, T.R.S. (2002) ‘The Constitutional Foundations of Judicial Review: Conceptual Conundrum or Interpretative Inquiry?’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 61(1), pp. 87–125. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S000819730200154X.

Allan, T.R.S. (2003) ‘Constitutional Dialogue and the Justification of Judicial Review’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 23(4). Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3600687.

Allan, T.R.S. (2005a) Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Allan, T.R.S. (2005b) Constitutional Justice: A Liberal Theory of the Rule of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199267880.001.0001.

Allan, T.R.S. (2006) ‘Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Critique of "Due Deference”’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 65(3), pp. 671–695. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197306007264.

Allan, T.R.S. (2011) ‘Judicial Deference and Judicial Review: Legal Doctrine and Legal Theory’, Law Quarterly Review, 127(1). Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I38697650034411E088BDC597D432CBAC/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

‘An Application by Siobhan Mclaughlin for Judicial Review [2016] NICA 53’ (no date). Available at: https://judiciaryni.uk/sites/judiciary/files/decisions/McLaughlin%27s%20%28Siobhan%29%20Application.pdf.

Arvind, T.T. (2017) ‘The Curious Origins of Judicial Review’, Law Quarterly Review, pp. 91–117. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I17F84060BE0811E689319702776550D2/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Atrill, S. (2003) ‘WHO IS THE "FAIR-MINDED AND INFORMED OBSERVER”? BIAS AFTER’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 62(2), pp. 279–289. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197303006317.

Attorney General v Jonathan Cape Ltd [1976] QB 752 (no date). Available at: http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI694B9730E42711DA8FC2A0F0355337E9%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue.

Bamforth, N. (1997) ‘Fairness and Legitimate Expectation in Judicial Review’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 56(1), pp. 1–4. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197300017530.

Barber, N.W. (2001a) ‘Prelude to the Separation of Powers’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 60(1), pp. 59–88. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197301000629.

Barber, N.W. (2001b) ‘Review: The Academic Mythologians’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 21(2). Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20468373.

Barber, N.W. (2009a) ‘Laws and Constitutional Conventions’, Law Quarterly Review, 125, pp. 294–309. Available at: http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI69EDD0210ACD11DE953BC0C525628E94%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue.

Barber, N.W. (2009b) ‘Laws and Constitutional Conventions’, Law Quarterly Review, pp. 294–309. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I69EDD0210ACD11DE953BC0C525628E94/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Bingham, T.H. (2011) The Rule of Law. London: Penguin.

Blake, N. (2002) ‘Importing Proportionality: Clarification or Confusion’, European Human Rights Law Review, pp. 19–27. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I84B178A0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Blog | UK Constitutional Law Association | affiliated to the International Association of Constitutional Law (no date). Available at: https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/blog/.

British and Irish Legal Information Institute (no date). Available at: http://www.bailii.org/.

British Railways Board v Pickin [1974] AC 765 (no date). Available at: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1974/1.html.

Campbell, N.R. (1994) ‘The Duty to Give Reasons in Administrative Law’, Public Law, pp. 184–191. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID39F4B20E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Chan, C. (2016) ‘A Preliminary Framework for Measuring Deference in Rights Reasoning’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 14(4), pp. 851–882. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mow058.

Clayton, R. (2015) ‘The Empire Strikes Back: Common Law Rights and the Human Rights Act’, Public Law, pp. 3–12. Available at: http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FIAD111C107B4F11E499B9D6E1F6E110C8%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue.

Constitution Committee | UK Parliament (no date). Available at: http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/lords-select/constitution-committee/.

Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1985] AC 374 (no date). Available at: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1984/9.html.

Craig, P. (1997) ‘Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law: An Analytical Framework’, Public Law, pp. 467–487.

Craig, P. (1998) ‘Ultra Vires and the Foundations of Judicial Review’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 57(1), pp. 63–90. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197300134397.

Craig, P. (1999) ‘Competing Models of Judicial Review’, Public Law, pp. 428–447. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID132DF00E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Craig, P. (2001) ‘The Courts, the Human Rights Act and Judicial Review’, Law Quarterly Review, pp. 589–603. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I848E3930E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Craig, P. (2003) ‘The Human Rights Act, Article 6 and Procedural Rights’, Public Law, pp. 753–773. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I84890911E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Craig, P. (2011) ‘Political Constitutionalism and the Judicial Role: A Response’, International Journal of Constitutional Law, 9(1), pp. 112–131. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mor025.

Craig, P. (2013) ‘The Nature of Reasonableness Review’, Current Legal Problems, 66(1), pp. 131–167. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cut010.

Craig, P. and Schonberg, S. (2000) ‘Substantive Legitimate Expectations After Coughlan’, Public Law, pp. 684–701. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I84A4F580E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Craig, R. (2017) ‘A Simple Application of the Frustration Principle: Prerogative, Statute and Miller’, Public Law [Preprint]. Available at: http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI8106D680C87411E79CFEFF663275FD29%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue.

Daly, P. (2010) ‘Justiciability and the “Political Question” Doctrine’, Public Law, pp. 160–178. Available at: http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI14A4A19044F511E88D34E20E69C76312%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue.

Delegated Legislation | UK Parliament (no date). Available at: https://www.parliament.uk/about/how/laws/delegated/.

Elliot, M. and Thomas, R. (2017) ‘Themes, Sources, and Principles’, in Public Law. 3rd edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198765899.001.0001.

Elliott, M. (1999) ‘The Demise of Parliamentary Sovereignty? the Implications for Justifying Judicial Review’, Law Quarterly Review, pp. 119–137. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ICCCA7BD0E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Elliott, M. (2006) ‘Legitimate Expectations: Procedure, Substance, Policy and Proportionality’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 65(2), pp. 254–256. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197306227119.

Elliott, M. (2012) ‘The Appearance of Bias, the Fair-Minded and Informed Observer, and the "Ordinary Person in Queen Square Market”’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 71(2), pp. 247–250. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197312000372.

Elliott, M. (2015a) ‘A Tangled Constitutional Web: The Black-Spider Memos and the British Constitution’s Relational Architecture’, Public Law, pp. 539–550. Available at: http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI3A34F4805C5611E58916B963212E7CCD%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue.

Elliott, M. (2015b) ‘The Principle of Parliamentary Sovereignty in Legal, Constitutional, and Political Perspective’, in J.L. Jowell, D. Oliver, and C. O’Cinneide (eds) The Changing Constitution. 8th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 38–66.

Elliott, M. (2018) Judicial Power and the United Kingdom’s Changing Constitution | Public Law for Everyone. Available at: https://publiclawforeveryone.com/2017/10/31/judicial-power-and-the-united-kingdoms-changing-constitution/.

Elliott, M. (no date) Mark Elliott: Justification, Calibration and Substantive Judicial Review: Putting Doctrine in its Place | UK Constitutional Law Association. Available at: https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/09/17/mark-elliott-justification-calibration-and-substantive-judicial-review-putting-doctrine-in-its-place/.

Elliott, M. and Thomas, R. (2017a) Public Law. 3rd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Elliott, M. and Thomas, R. (2017b) Public Law. 3rd edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198765899.001.0001.

Elliott, M. and Thomas, R. (2017c) ‘Themes, Sources, and Principles’, in Public Law. 3rd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 36–86.

European Court of Human Rights (no date). Available at: http://www.echr.coe.int/Pages/home.aspx?p=home.

‘Exercise of Discretion in Administrative Decision-Making’ (no date). Available at: http://www.ombudsman.wa.gov.au/Publications/Documents/guidelines/Exercise-of-discretion-in-admin-decision-making.pdf.

Feldman, D. (2005) ‘None, One or Several? Perspectives on the UK’s Constitution(s)’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 64(2), pp. 329–351. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197305006884.

Fenwick, H. (2002) ‘The Anti–Terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001: A Proportionate Response to 11 September?’, The Modern Law Review, 65(5), pp. 724–762. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00405.

Ferreira, N. (2015) ‘The Supreme Court in a Final Push to Go Beyond Strasbourg’, Public Law [Preprint]. Available at: http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI5409B340105311E5995D9B4942D36284%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue.

Forsyth, C. (1996) ‘Of Fig Leaves and Fairy Tales: The Ultra Vires Doctrine, the Sovereignty of Parliament and Judicial Review’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 55(1), pp. 122–140. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197300097762.

Forsyth, C. and Elliott, M. (2003) ‘The Legitimacy of Judicial Review’, Public Law, pp. 286–307. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I795AA3A0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Gavin Phillipson: Historic Commons Syria Vote: The Constitutional Significance (Part I) | UK Constitutional Law Association (no date). Available at: https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/09/19/gavin-phillipson-historic-commons-syria-vote-the-constitutional-significance-part-i/.

Gavin Phillipson: Historic Commons Syria Vote: The Constitutional Significance. Part II the Way Forward | UK Constitutional Law Association (no date). Available at: https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/11/29/gavin-phillipson-historic-commons-syria-vote-the-constitutional-significance-part-ii-the-way-forward/.

Gee, G. and Webber, G.C.N. (2010) ‘What Is a Political Constitution?’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 30(2), pp. 273–299. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqq013.

Ghaidan v. Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30 (no date). Available at: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2004/30.html.

Goldsworthy, J. (2003) ‘Homogenizing Constitutions’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 23(3), pp. 483–505. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/23.3.483.

Gordon, M. (2015) Parliamentary Sovereignty in the UK Constitution: Process, Politics and Democracy. Oxford: Hart Publishing. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781474201667.

Gregson, R. (2017) ‘When Should There Be an Implied Power to Delegate?’, Public Law, pp. 408–425. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IB5E035E04C6411E79A6EF925F51871C7/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Hale, B. (2012) ‘Argentoratum Locutum: Is Strasbourg or the Supreme Court Supreme?’, Human Rights Law Review, 12(1), pp. 65–78. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngs001.

Hale, Lady (2015) ‘The UK Supreme Court in the UK Constitution’ (Inaugural Lecture at the Institute for Legal and Constitutional Research, University of St Andrews, 8th of October 2015, pp. 1–17. Available at: https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/speech-151008.pdf.

Hickman, T. (2008) ‘The Substance and Structure of Proportionality’, Public Law, pp. 694–716. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I010EBB7099A111DD9611E019A6BFBE26/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Hilson, C. (2002) ‘Judicial Review, Policies and the Fettering of Discretion’, Public Law, pp. 111–129. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID10F7880E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Human Rights Act 1998 (no date). Available at: http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI5FB840F0E42311DAA7CF8F68F6EE57AB%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue.

‘In the Matter of an Application by Siobhan McLaughlin for Judicial Review (Northern Ireland) [2018] UKSC 48’ (no date). Available at: https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2017-0035-judgment.pdf.

‘International Journal of Constitutional Law’ (no date). Available at: https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/permalink/44ROY_INST/16u3s8/alma997000681902671.

Jackson & Ors v. Her Majesty’s Attorney General [2005] UKHL 56 (no date a). Available at: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/56.html.

Jackson & Ors v. Her Majesty’s Attorney General [2005] UKHL 56 (no date b). Available at: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/2005/56.html.

Jaconelli, J. (2005a) ‘Do Constitutional Conventions Bind?’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 64(1), pp. 149–176. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197305006823.

Jaconelli, J. (2005b) ‘Do Constitutional Conventions Bind?’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 64(1), pp. 149–176. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197305006823.

Jones, B.C. (2016) ‘Preliminary Warnings on “Constitutional” Idolatry’, Public Law, pp. 74–92. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IE932C1D09A7F11E5ACC99E2443923C19/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Jowell, J. (1999) ‘Of Vires and Vacuums: The Constitutional Context of Judicial Review’, Public Law, pp. 448–460. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID1392090E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Jowell, J. (2006) ‘Parliamentary Sovereignty Under the New Constitutional Hypothesis’, Public Law, pp. 562–579.

Jowell, J. and Lester, A. (1988) ‘Beyond Wednesbury: Substantive Principles of Administrative Law’, Commonwealth Law Bulletin, 14(2), pp. 858–870. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/03050718.1988.9985971.

Kavanaugh, A. (2010) ‘Defending Deference in Public Law and Constitutional Theory’, Law Quarterly Review, 222. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IF3B510D22E5211DFBE2FA967ED04D069/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Knight, C.J.S. (2009) ‘A Framework for Fettering’, Judicial Review, 14(1), pp. 73–80. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/10854681.2009.11426590.

Le Sueur, A.P. (1999) ‘Legal Duties to Give Reasons’, Current Legal Problems, 52(1), pp. 150–172. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/52.1.150.

Le Sueur, A.P., Sunkin, M. and Murkens, J.E. (2016) Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 3rd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Le Sueur, A.P., Sunkin, M. and Murkens, J.E. (2019) Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://doi.org.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/10.1093/he/9780198820284.001.0001.

‘Legal Studies: The Journal of the Society of Legal Scholars’ (no date). Available at: https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/permalink/44ROY_INST/16u3s8/alma997017693302671.

Lever, A. (2007) ‘Is Judicial Review Undemocratic?’, Public Law, pp. 280–298. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I25BAEDE0E30911DB9628FD37664FF158/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Liversidge v Anderson [1941] UKHL 1 (no date). Available at: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKHL/1941/1.html.

Lord Lester of Herne Hill (2001) ‘Developing Constitutional Principles of Public Law’, Public Law, pp. 684–694. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I849E17B0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Loveland, I. (2003) ‘Does Homelessness Decision Making Engage Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights?’, European Human Rights Law Review, pp. 176–204. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I7E856C70E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Loveland, I. (2015) ‘Human Rights II: Emergent Principles’, in Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction. 7th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 588–615.

Loveland, I. (2018) ‘Human Rights II: Emergent Principles’, in Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction. 8th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198804680.001.0001.

Loveland, I. (2021a) Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction. 9th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Loveland, I. (2021b) Constitutional Law, Administrative Law, and Human Rights: A Critical Introduction. 9th Edition. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press.

Malleson, K. (2000) ‘Judicial Bias and Disqualification After Pinochet (No. 2)’, Modern Law Review, 63(1), pp. 119–127. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.00254.

Mark Elliot: Reflections on the HS2 Case: A Hierarchy of Domestic Constitutional Norms and the Qualified Primacy of EU Law | UK Constitutional Law Association (no date). Available at: https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2014/01/23/mark-elliot-reflections-on-the-hs2-case-a-hierarchy-of-domestic-constitutional-norms-and-the-qualified-primacy-of-eu-law/.

Masterman, R. and Murray, C. (2003) ‘Law, Politics, and the United Kingdom Constitution’, in Exploring Constitutional and Administrative Law, pp. 88–108. Available at: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13409289760002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670.

Masterman, R. and Murray, C. (2013) ‘Law, Politics, and the United Kingdom Constitution’, in Exploring Constitutional and Administrative Law. Harlow, England: Pearson, pp. 88–108.

‘McLoughlin Supreme Court Press Summary’ (no date). Available at: https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2017-0035-press-summary.pdf.

Miller & Anor, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (Rev 3) [2017] UKSC 5 (no date). Available at: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2017/5.html.

Murkens, J.E.K. (2018) ‘Democracy as the Legitimating Condition in the UK Constitution’, Legal Studies, 38(01), pp. 42–58. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2017.10.

Nicol, D. (2006) ‘Law and Politics After the Human Rights Act’, Public Law, pp. 722–751. Available at: http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI13579C41540511DB85F29853495F842F%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue.

Norris, M. (1996) ‘Ex Parte Smith: Irrationality and Human Rights’, Public Law, pp. 590–600. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID37F6710E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Oliver, D. (1987) ‘Is the Ultra Vires Rule the Basis of Judicial Review?’, Public Law, pp. 543–569. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID3D7E750E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Olowofoyeku, A.A. (2000) ‘The Nemo Judex Rule: The Case Against Automatic Disqualification’, Public Law, pp. 456–475. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID12EE760E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Olowofoyeku, A.A. (2009) ‘Bias and the Informed Observer: A Call for a Return to Gough’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 68(2), pp. 388–409. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197309000373.

‘Oxford Journal of Legal Studies’ (no date). Available at: https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/permalink/44ROY_INST/70508m/alma997001809702671.

Perry, A. and Tucker, A. (2018) ‘Top-Down Constitutional Conventions’, The Modern Law Review, 81(5), pp. 765–789. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12364.

Phillipson, G. (no date a) ‘Historic’ Commons’ Syria Vote: The Constitutional Significance. Part I | UK Constitutional Law Association. Available at: https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/09/19/gavin-phillipson-historic-commons-syria-vote-the-constitutional-significance-part-i/.

Phillipson, G. (no date b) "Historic” Commons’ Syria Vote: The Constitutional Significance. Part II | the Way Forward – UK Constitutional Law Association. Available at: https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2013/11/29/gavin-phillipson-historic-commons-syria-vote-the-constitutional-significance-part-ii-the-way-forward/.

Political and Constitutional Reform Committee | UK Parliament (no date). Available at: http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/political-and-constitutional-reform-committee/.

Poole, T. (2005) ‘Of Headscarves and Heresies: The Denbigh High School Case and Public Authority Decision-Making Under the Human Rights Act’, Public Law, pp. 685–695. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I848A1A80E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Poole, T. (2009) ‘The Reformation of English Administrative Law’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 68(1), pp. 142–168. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197309000063.

​Principles of Good Administration | Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) (no date). Available at: https://www.ombudsman.org.uk/about-us/our-principles/principles-good-administration.

Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee | UK Parliament (no date). Available at: http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/public-administration-and-constitutional-affairs-committee/.

‘Public Law’ (no date). Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/WestlawUk/Journals/Publications/Public-Law.

R (Chester) v Secretary of State for Justice [2013] UKSC 63 (no date). Available at: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2013/63.html.

R (Evans) v Attorney General [2015] UKSC 21 (no date). Available at: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKSC/2015/21.html.

R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union [2017] UKSC 5, [40]-[49] (no date). Available at: https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2016-0196.html.

R (on the application of Nicklinson and another) (Appellants) v Ministry of Justice (Respondent) [2014] UKSC 38 (no date). Available at: https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2013-0235.html.

Rainey, B., Wicks, E. and Ovey, C. (2014) ‘Context, Background, and Institutions’, in Jacobs, White and Ovey: The European Convention on Human Rights. 6th Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–20.

Ringhand, L. (2005) ‘Fig Leaves, Fairy Tales, and Constitutional Foundations: Debating Judicial Review in Britain’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 43(3). Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?public=false&handle=hein.journals/cjtl43&id=1.

Rivers, J. (2006) ‘Proportionality and Variable Intensity of Review’, Cambridge Law Journal, 65, pp. 174–207. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IFB69CD50E72A11DC88EB9BE684C867E2/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Sales, P. (2013) ‘Rationality, Proportionality and the Development of the Law’, Law Quarterly Review, pp. 223–241. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I69812151881411E2BACCBED531DFD77E/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Stanton, J. and Prescott, C. (2018a) ‘Judicial Review: Access to Review and Remedies’, in Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stanton, J. and Prescott, C. (2018b) ‘Judicial Review: Access to Review and Remedies’, in Public Law. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722939.001.0001.

Stanton, J. and Prescott, C. (2018c) ‘Judicial Review: Illegality’, in Public law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stanton, J. and Prescott, C. (2018d) ‘Judicial Review: Illegality’, in Public Law. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722939.001.0001.

Stanton, J. and Prescott, C. (2018e) ‘Judicial Review: Irrationality and Proportionality’, in Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stanton, J. and Prescott, C. (2018f) ‘Judicial Review: Irrationality and Proportionality’, in Public Law. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722939.001.0001.

Stanton, J. and Prescott, C. (2018g) ‘Judicial Review: Procedural Impropriety’, in Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stanton, J. and Prescott, C. (2018h) ‘Judicial Review: Procedural Impropriety’, in Public Law. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722939.001.0001.

Stanton, J. and Prescott, C. (2018i) ‘Judicial Review: Procedural Impropriety’, in Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stanton, J. and Prescott, C. (2018j) ‘Judicial Review: Procedural Impropriety’, in Public Law. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722939.001.0001.

Stanton, J. and Prescott, C. (2018k) Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stanton, J. and Prescott, C. (2018l) ‘The Royal Prerogative and Constitutional Conventions’, in Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stanton, J. and Prescott, C. (2018m) ‘The Royal Prerogative and Constitutional Conventions’, in Public Law. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722939.001.0001.

Stanton, J., Prescott, C. and Mead, D. (2018) Public Law. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722939.001.0001.

Stark, S.W. (2017) ‘Facing Facts: Judicial Approaches to Section 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998’, Law Quarterly Review [Preprint]. Available at: http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI553CB880985E11E7BEB8FD7157D7F73E%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue.

Supperstone, M. and Coppel, J. (1999) ‘Judicial Review After the Human Rights Act’, European Human Rights Law Review, pp. 301–329. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I84ACE4C0E45411DA92358E85EE602D8A/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Taming the Prerogative: Strengthening Ministerial Accountability to Parliament (2003). House of Commons. Public Administration Select Committee. Available at: https://parlipapers.proquest.com/parlipapers/result/pqpdocumentview?accountid=11455&groupid=103502&pgId=c5aea05f-b8ed-42b0-b2e6-8c68938d85ec.

Taylor, R.B. (2015a) ‘Foundational and Regulatory Conventions: Exploring the Constitutional Significance of Britain’s Dependency Upon Conventions.’, Public Law, pp. 614–632. Available at: http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FI3A36A2305C5611E58916B963212E7CCD%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue.

Taylor, R.B. (2015b) ‘Foundational and Regulatory Conventions: Exploring the Constitutional Significance of Britain’s Dependency Upon Conventions’, Public Law, pp. 614–632. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/I3A36A2305C5611E58916B963212E7CCD/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

‘The Cambridge Law Journal’ (no date). Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/cambridge-law-journal.

The Constitution Unit Blog (no date). Available at: https://constitution-unit.com/.

‘The Law Quarterly Review’ (no date).

‘The Modern Law Review’ (no date). Available at: https://librarysearch.royalholloway.ac.uk/permalink/44ROY_INST/16u3s8/alma997003019902671.

Tomkins, A. (2002) ‘In Defence of the Political Constitution’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 22(1), pp. 157–175. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/22.1.157.

‘Tomlinson and Others v Birmingham City Council  [2010] UKSC 8’ (no date a). Available at: https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2009-0050-judgment.pdf.

‘Tomlinson and Others v Birmingham City Council  [2010] UKSC 8’ (no date b). Available at: https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2009-0050-judgment.pdf.

Tomlinson, J. (2017) ‘The Narrow Approach to Substantive Legitimate Expectations and the Trend of Modern Authority’, Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal, 17(1), pp. 75–84. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/14729342.2017.1311514.

Turner, I. (2009) ‘Irrationality, the Human Rights Act and the Limits of Merits-Review’, Nottingham Law Journal, 18, pp. 18–36. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IC5A4DCE02B5711E08221F700C27502AE/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

UK Constitutional Law Association Blog | International Association of Constitutional Law (no date). Available at: https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/blog/.

UK Human Rights Blog (no date). Available at: https://ukhumanrightsblog.com/.

UK Parliament (no date). Available at: http://www.parliament.uk/.

Unmarried Mother Siobhan McLaughlin Wins Supreme Court Benefit Case | BBC (2018). Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-45355028.

‘Unmarried Mother Wins Supreme Court Fight for Widowed Parents’ Allowance | Good Morning Britain | YouTube’ (no date). Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cs4viID3KWI.

Varuhas, J.N.E. (2013a) ‘The Reformation of English Administrative Law? "Rights”, Rhetoric and Reality’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 72(2), pp. 369–413. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197313000500.

Varuhas, J.N.E. (2013b) ‘The Reformation of English Administrative Law? "Rights”, Rhetoric and Reality’, The Cambridge Law Journal, 72(2), pp. 369–413. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197313000500.

Waldron, J. (2006) ‘The Core of the Case Against Judicial Review’, The Yale Law Journal, 115(6). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/20455656.

Walker, P. (1995) ‘What’s Wrong With Irrationality?’, Public Law, pp. 556–576. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID3967180E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Watson, J. (2010) ‘Clarity and Ambiguity: A New Approach to the Test of Legitimacy in the Law of Legitimate Expectations’, Legal Studies, 30(4), pp. 633–652. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2010.00177.x.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2015a) ‘Human Rights’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 3rd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 255–290.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2015b) ‘Human Rights’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 3rd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 255–290.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2015c) ‘Parliamentary Supremacy: The Theory’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 3rd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 185–226.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2015d) ‘The Crown Royal Perogative’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 3rd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 145–182.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2015e) ‘The Role of Constitutional Conventions’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 3rd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 365–393.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2015f) ‘The Rule of Law’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 3rd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 77–113.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2018a) ‘“Constitutional Organisations, Institutions and Roles” and “The Nature of the British Constitution”’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 3rd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 13–15.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2018b) ‘“Constitutional Organisations, Institutions and Roles” and “The Nature of the British Constitution”’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2018c) ‘Human Rights’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2018d) ‘Human Rights’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2018e) ‘Illegality’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2018f) ‘Illegality’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2018g) ‘Irrationality and Proportionality’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2018h) ‘Irrationality and Proportionality’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2018i) ‘Parliamentary Supremacy: The Theory’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2018j) ‘Procedural Impropriety’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2018k) ‘Procedural Impropriety’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2018l) ‘Procedural Impropriety’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2018m) ‘Procedural Impropriety’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2018n) ‘The Crown Royal Perogative’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2018o) ‘The Role of Constitutional Conventions’, Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2018p) ‘The Role of Constitutional Conventions’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2018q) ‘The Role of Constitutional Conventions’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2018r) ‘The Role of the Courts, Judicial Review, and Human Rights’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2018s) ‘The Role of the Courts, Judicial Review, and Human Rights’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2018t) ‘The Rule of Law’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2018u) ‘“What is Public Law” and “Constitutional Organisations, Institutions, and Roles”, and “The Nature of the British Constitution”’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 3rd Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–76.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2018v) ‘What is Public Law’ and “Constitutional Organisations, Institutions, and Roles”, and “The Nature of the British Constitution”’, in Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 4th edn. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198798064.001.0001.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2021a) Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. Fifth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Webley, L. and Samuels, H. (2021b) Complete Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. 5th Edition. [Oxford]: Oxford University Press. Available at: https://doi-org.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/10.1093/he/9780198853183.001.0001.

Where Next for the Wednesbury Principle? a Brief Response to Lord Carnwath | Public Law for Everyone (no date). Available at: https://publiclawforeveryone.com/2013/11/19/where-next-for-the-wednesbury-principle-a-brief-response-to-lord-carnwath/.

Williams, D. (2000) ‘Bias; the Judges and the Separation of Powers’, Public Law, pp. 45–60. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID1246010E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Williams, R. (2017) ‘Structuring Substantive Review’, Public Law, pp. 99–123. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/IF32A9D40BAFC11E695A4FB481AEC10EF/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Wong, G. (2000) ‘Towards the Nutcracker Principle: Reconsidering the Objections to Proportionality’, Public Law, pp. 92–109. Available at: https://uk.westlaw.com/Document/ID1301FE1E72111DA9D198AF4F85CA028/View/FullText.html?skipAnonymous=true.

Young, A.L. (2011) ‘Is Dialogue Working Under the Human Rights Act 1998?’, Public Law, pp. 773–800. Available at: http://signon.thomsonreuters.com/federation/UKF?entityID=http%3A%2F%2Fidp.rhul.ac.uk%2Foala&returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fuk.practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com%2FDocument%2FID7EAF690E23C11E080A9C399189E1576%2FView%2FFullText.html%3FskipAnonymous%3Dtrue.

Young, A.L. (2014) ‘Will You, Won’t You, Will You Join the Deference Dance?’, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 34(2), pp. 375–394. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqu004.