[1]
M. Usher, ‘Veins of Concrete, Cities of Flow: Reasserting the Centrality of Circulation in Foucault’s Analytics of Government’, Mobilities, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 550–569, 2014, doi: 10.1080/17450101.2014.961263.
[2]
R. Desai, ‘The Politics of Open Defecation: Informality, Body, and Infrastructure in Mumbai’, Antipode, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 98–120, 2015, doi: 10.1111/anti.12117.
[3]
M. Gandy, ‘Learning From Lagos’, New Left Review, vol. 33, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://newleftreview.org/II/33/matthew-gandy-learning-from-lagos
[4]
S. Graham, ‘FlowCity: Networked Mobilities and the Contemporary Metropolis’, Journal of Urban Technology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–20, 2002, doi: 10.1080/106307302317379800.
[5]
S. Graham and S. Marvin, Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. London: Routledge, 2001.
[6]
S. Graham and S. Marvin, Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. London: Routledge, 2001 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=170145
[7]
M. Kaika and E. Swyngedouw, ‘Fetishizing the Modern City: The Phantasmagoria of Urban Technological Networks’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 120–138, 2000, doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.00239.
[8]
C. McFarlane, ‘Sanitation in Mumbai’s Informal Settlements: State, “Slum”, and Infrastructure’, Environment and Planning A, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 88–107, 2008, doi: 10.1068/a39221.
[9]
P. Merriman, ‘Driving Places’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 21, no. 4–5, pp. 145–167, 2004, doi: 10.1177/0263276404046065.
[10]
J. Silver, ‘Disrupted Infrastructures: An Urban Political Ecology of Interrupted Electricity in Accra’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 984–1003, 2015, doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12317.
[11]
H. Bulkeley, ‘Low-carbon Transitions and the Reconfiguration of Urban Infrastructure’, Urban Studies, vol. 51, no. 7, pp. 1471–1486, 2014, doi: 10.1177/0042098013500089.
[12]
M. Gandy, ‘Water, Sanitation and the Modern City: Colonial and Post-Colonial Experiences in Lagos and Mumbai’, 2006 [Online]. Available: https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/hdrhdocpa/hdocpa-2006-06.htm
[13]
S. Graham, Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails, 1. publ. New York [u.a.]: Routledge, 2010.
[14]
S. Graham, Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails. New York: Routledge, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=452313
[15]
C. McFarlane, ‘Informal Urban Sanitation: Everyday Life, Poverty, and Comparison’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 104, no. 5, pp. 989–1011, 2014, doi: 10.1080/00045608.2014.923718.
[16]
M. A. Niedzielski and E. J. Malecki, ‘Making Tracks: Rail Networks in World Cities’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, vol. 102, no. 6, pp. 1409–1431, 2012, doi: 10.1080/00045608.2011.601212.
[17]
A. Nikolaeva, ‘Designing Public Space for Mobility: Contestation, Negotiation and Experiment at Amsterdam Airport Schiphol’, Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, vol. 103, no. 5, pp. 542–554, 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9663.2012.00740.x.
[18]
A. Roy, ‘Urban Informality: Toward an Epistemology of Planning’, Journal of the American Planning Association, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 147–158, 2005 [Online]. Available: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=16915213&site=ehost-live
[19]
J. Silver, ‘Incremental Infrastructures: Material Improvisation and Social Collaboration Across Post-Colonial Accra’, Urban Geography, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 788–804, 2014, doi: 10.1080/02723638.2014.933605.
[20]
M. W. Swanson, ‘The Sanitation Syndrome: Bubonic Plague and Urban Native Policy in the Cape Colony, 1900-1909’, The Journal of African HistoryThe Great CircleAfrica TodayJournal of Southern African Studies, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 387–410, 1977 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/180639
[21]
D. Young and R. Keil, ‘Reconnecting the Disconnected: The Politics of Infrastructure in the In-Between City’, Cities, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 87–95, 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2009.10.002.
[22]
M.-H. Zérah, ‘Splintering Urbanism in Mumbai: Contrasting Trends in a Multilayered Society’, Geoforum, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1922–1932, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.02.001.
[23]
M.-H. Zerah, ‘Participatory Governance in Urban Management and the Shifting Geometry of Power in Mumbai’, Development and Change, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 853–877, 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01586.x.
[24]
I. Charney and G. Rosen, ‘Splintering Skylines in a Fractured City: High-Rise Geographies in Jerusalem’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 32, no. 6, pp. 1088–1101, 2014, doi: 10.1068/d13174p.
[25]
S. Graham and L. Hewitt, ‘Getting Off the Ground’, Progress in Human Geography, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 72–92, 2013, doi: 10.1177/0309132512443147.
[26]
S. Graham, Vertical: The City From Satellites to Bunkers. London: Verso, 2016.
[27]
A. Harris, ‘Vertical Urbanisms’, Progress in Human Geography, vol. 39, no. 5, pp. 601–620, 2015, doi: 10.1177/0309132514554323.
[28]
J. M. Jacobs and S. Cairns, ‘Ecologies of Dwelling: Maintaining High‐Rise Housing in Singapore’, in The New Blackwell Companion to the City, Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011, pp. 79–95.
[29]
J. M. Jacobs and S. Cairns, ‘Ecologies of Dwelling: Maintaining High‐Rise Housing in Singapore.’, in The New Blackwell Companion to the City, Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011, pp. 79–95 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=675232
[30]
D. McNeill, ‘Skyscraper Geography’, Progress in Human Geography, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 41–55, 2005, doi: 10.1191/0309132505ph527oa.
[31]
P. Adey, ‘Introduction: Air-Target: Distance, Reach and the Politics of Verticality’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 28, no. 7–8, pp. 173–187, 2011, doi: 10.1177/0263276411424759.
[32]
P. Adey, ‘Vertical Security in the Megacity’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 51–67, 2010, doi: 10.1177/0263276410380943.
[33]
R. Baxter, ‘The High-Rise Home: Verticality as Practice in London’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 334–352, 2017, doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12451.
[34]
L. Bondi, ‘Gender Symbols and Urban Landscapes’, Progress in Human Geography, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 157–170, 1992, doi: 10.1177/030913259201600201.
[35]
J. W. Crampton, ‘Assemblage of the Vertical: Commercial Drones and Algorithmic Life’, Geographica Helvetica, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 137–146, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-137-2016.
[36]
S. Elden, ‘Secure the Volume: Vertical Geopolitics and the Depth of Power’, Political Geography, vol. 34, pp. 35–51, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2012.12.009.
[37]
B. L. Garrett, ‘Picturing Urban Subterranea: Embodied Aesthetics of London’s Sewers’, Environment and Planning A, vol. 48, no. 10, pp. 1948–1966, 2016, doi: 10.1177/0308518X16652396.
[38]
B. L. Garrett, ‘Undertaking Recreational Trespass: Urban Exploration and Infiltration’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2014, doi: 10.1111/tran.12001.
[39]
B. L. Garrett, ‘Urban Explorers: Quests for Myth, Mystery and Meaning’, Geography Compass, vol. 4, no. 10, pp. 1448–1461, 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00389.x.
[40]
B. L. Garrett, Explore Everything: Place-Hacking the City. Brooklyn, NY: Verso, 2013.
[41]
D. Gilbert, ‘The Three Ages of Aerial Vision: London’s Aerial Iconography From Wenceslaus Hollar to Google Earth’, The London Journal, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 289–299, 2010, doi: 10.1179/174963210X12814015170278.
[42]
S. Graham, ‘Super-tall and Ultra-deep: The Cultural Politics of the Elevator’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 31, no. 7–8, pp. 239–265, 2014, doi: 10.1177/0263276414554044.
[43]
S. Graham, ‘Vanity and Violence’, City, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 755–771, 2016, doi: 10.1080/13604813.2016.1224503.
[44]
L. Hewitt and S. Graham, ‘Vertical Cities: Representations of Urban Verticality in 20th-Century Science Fiction Literature’, Urban Studies, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 923–937, 2015, doi: 10.1177/0042098014529345.
[45]
C. Harker, ‘The Only Way Is Up? Ordinary Topologies of Ramallah’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 318–335, 2014, doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12094.
[46]
T. Hinchcliffe and D. Deriu, ‘Introduction Eyes over London: Re-Imagining the Metropolis in the Age of Aerial Vision’, The London Journal, vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 221–224, 2010, doi: 10.1179/174963210X12814015170070.
[47]
J. M. Jacobs, ‘A Geography of Big Things’, Cultural Geographies, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–27, 2006, doi: 10.1191/1474474006eu354oa.
[48]
J. M. Jacobs, ‘“A Tall Storey ... But, a Fact Just the Same”: The Red Road High-Rise as a Black Box’, Urban Studies, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 609–629, 2007, doi: 10.1080/00420980601131910.
[49]
O. B. Jensen, ‘Drone City – Power, Design and Aerial Mobility in the Age of "Smart Cities”’, Geographica Helvetica, vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 67–75, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-67-2016. [Online]. Available: https://www.geogr-helv.net/71/67/2016/
[50]
C. Johnston, ‘On Not Falling’, Performance Research, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 30–35, 2013, doi: 10.1080/13528165.2013.814344.
[51]
N. Leshem, ‘"Over Our Dead Bodies”: Placing Necropolitical Activism’, Political Geography, vol. 45, pp. 34–44, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.09.003.
[52]
R. Mackay, ‘“Going Backwards in Time to Talk about the Present”: Man On a Wire and Verticality after 9/11’, Comparative American Studies An International Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 3–20, 2011, doi: 10.1179/147757011X12983070064791.
[53]
L. Muntean, ‘Men on Wire’. 2007 [Online]. Available: http://seas3.elte.hu/anachronist/2010Muntean.pdf
[54]
S. Nam, ‘Phnom Penh’s Vertical Turn’, City, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 622–631, 2017, doi: 10.1080/13604813.2017.1375725.
[55]
M. Nethercote and R. Horne, ‘Ordinary Vertical Urbanisms: City Apartments and the Everyday Geographies of High-Rise Families’, Environment and Planning A, vol. 48, no. 8, pp. 1581–1598, 2016, doi: 10.1177/0308518X16645104.
[56]
G. Rosen and I. Charney, ‘Divided We Rise: Politics, Architecture and Vertical Cityscapes at Opposite Ends of Jerusalem’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 163–174, 2016, doi: 10.1111/tran.12112.
[57]
P. K. Saint-Amour, ‘Applied Modernism’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 28, no. 7–8, pp. 241–269, 2011, doi: 10.1177/0263276411423938.
[58]
B. L. Saitluanga, ‘Vertical Differentiation in Urban Space: A Case of Aizawl City’, Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 216–228, 2017, doi: 10.1111/sjtg.12194.
[59]
J. Coaffee, ‘Recasting the "Ring of Steel”: Designing Out Terrorism in the City of London?’, in Cities, War, and Terrorism: Towards an Urban Geopolitics, Malden, Mass: Blackwell Publishing, 2004.
[60]
J. Coaffee, ‘Recasting the "Ring of Steel”: Designing Out Terrorism in the City of London?’, in Cities, War and Terrorism: Towards an Urban Geopolitics, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=351008
[61]
J. Coaffee, ‘Laminated Security for London 2012’, Urban Studies, vol. 48, no. 15, pp. 3311–3327, 2011, doi: 10.1177/0042098011422398.
[62]
J. Sim and R. Coleman, ‘“You’ll Never Walk Alone”: CCTV Surveillance, Order and Neo-Liberal Rule in Liverpool City’, British Journal of Sociology, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 623–639, 2000, doi: 10.1080/00071310020015299.
[63]
N. R. Fyfe and J. Bannister, ‘City Watching: Closed Circuit Television Surveillance in Public Spaces’, Area, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 37–46, 1996 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20003625?sid=primo
[64]
H. Koskela, ‘“The Gaze Without Eyes”: Video-Surveillance and the Changing Nature of Urban Space’, Progress in Human Geography, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 243–265, 2000, doi: 10.1191/030913200668791096.
[65]
F. Klauser, ‘Spatialities of Security and Surveillance: Managing Spaces, Separations and Circulations at Sport Mega Events’, Geoforum, vol. 49, pp. 289–298, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.11.011.
[66]
H. M. Lomell, ‘Targeting the Unwanted: Video Surveillance and Categorical Exclusion in Oslo, Norway’, Surveillance & Society, vol. 2, no. 2/3, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/3382
[67]
C. Norris and G. Armstrong, Maximum Surveillance Society: The Rise of CCTV. Oxford: Berg Publishers, 1999.
[68]
C. Norris, ‘The Growth of CCTV: A Global Perspective on the International Diffusion of Video Surveillance in Publicly Accessible Space’, Surveillance & Society, vol. 2, no. 2/3, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/3369
[69]
‘Surveillance & Society Homepage’. [Online]. Available: http://www.surveillance-and-society.org/
[70]
A. Arvidsson, ‘On the “Pre-History of The Panoptic Sort”: Mobility in Market Research.’, Surveillance & Society, vol. 1, no. 4, 2003 [Online]. Available: https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/3331
[71]
P. Adey, ‘Facing Airport Security: Affect, Biopolitics, and the Preemptive Securitisation of the Mobile Body’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 274–295, 2009, doi: 10.1068/d0208.
[72]
M. Bitnik, ‘Surveillance Chess’, Surveillance & Society, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 459–465, 2014 [Online]. Available: https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/chess
[73]
J. Coaffee, ‘Rings of Steel, Rings of Concrete and Rings of Confidence: Designing Out Terrorism in Central London Pre and Post September 11th’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 201–211, 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.0309-1317.2004.00511.x.
[74]
R. Coleman, ‘Images From a Neoliberal City: The State, Surveillance and Social Control’, Critical Criminology, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 21–42, 2004, doi: 10.1023/B:CRIT.0000024443.08828.d8.
[75]
M. Crang and S. Graham, ‘Sentient Cities Ambient Intelligence and the Politics of Urban Space’, Information, Communication & Society, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 789–817, 2007, doi: 10.1080/13691180701750991.
[76]
M. Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin, 1991.
[77]
C. Fonio and G. Pisapia, ‘Security, Surveillance and Geographical Patterns at the 2010 FIFA World Cup in Johannesburg’, The Geographical Journal, vol. 181, no. 3, pp. 242–248, 2015, doi: 10.1111/geoj.12089.
[78]
P. Fussey, ‘The Regeneration Games: Purity and Security in the Olympic City1’, The British Journal of Sociology, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 260–284, 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2012.01409.x.
[79]
S. Graham and D. Wood, ‘Digitizing Surveillance: Categorization, Space, Inequality’, Critical Social Policy, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 227–248, 2003, doi: 10.1177/0261018303023002006.
[80]
K. Haggerty and R. V. Ericson, ‘The Surveillant Assemblage’, British Journal of Sociology, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 605–622, 2000, doi: 10.1080/00071310020015280.
[81]
S. Herbert, ‘The Geopolitics of the Police: Foucault, Disciplinary Power and the Tactics of the Los Angeles Police Department’, Political Geography, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 47–59, 1996, doi: 10.1016/0962-6298(95)00004-6.
[82]
R. Kitchin, ‘The Real-Time City? Big Data and Smart Urbanism’, GeoJournalSocial ScientistScientific American, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24432611
[83]
H. Koskela, ‘“The Gaze Without Eyes”: Video-Surveillance and the Changing Nature of Urban Space’, Progress in Human Geography, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 243–265, 2000, doi: 10.1191/030913200668791096.
[84]
H. Koskela, ‘“Cam Era” — the Contemporary Urban Panopticon’, Surveillance & Society, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 292–313, 2003 [Online]. Available: https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/3342
[85]
R. Lippert, ‘Municipal Corporate Security and the Intensification of Urban Surveillance’, Surveillance & Society, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 310–320, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/intensification
[86]
C. Little, ‘The “Mosquito” and the Transformation of British Public Space’, Journal of Youth Studies, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 167–182, 2015, doi: 10.1080/13676261.2014.944119.
[87]
D. Lyon, Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk, and Digital Discrimination. New York: Routledge, 2003.
[88]
D. Lyon, Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk, and Digital Discrimination. London: Routledge, 2003 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=240591
[89]
D. Lyon, Surveillance After September 11. Malden, Mass: Polity, 2003.
[90]
R. Jackson, Routledge Handbook of Critical Terrorism Studies. New York: Routledge, 2016.
[91]
R. Jackson, Routledge Handbook of Critical Terrorism Studies. London: Routledge, 2016 [Online]. Available: http://ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/login?url=http://www.dawsonera.com/depp/reader/protected/external/AbstractView/S9781315813462
[92]
D. Mitchell and N. Heynen, ‘The Geography of Survival and the Right to the City: Speculations on Surveillance, Legal Innovation, and the Criminalization of Intervention’, Urban Geography, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 611–632, 2009, doi: 10.2747/0272-3638.30.6.611.
[93]
D. Murakami Wood, ‘Surveillance in Urban Japan: A Critical Introduction’, Urban Studies, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 551–568, 2007, doi: 10.1080/00420980601176097.
[94]
H. Yacobi, ‘In-Between Surveillance and Spatial Protest: the Production of Space of the “Mixed City” of Lod?’, Surveillance & Society, vol. 2, no. 1, 2004 [Online]. Available: https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/3327
[95]
S. Elden, ‘Secure the Volume: Vertical Geopolitics and the Depth of Power’, Political Geography, vol. 34, pp. 35–51, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2012.12.009.
[96]
S. Graham, ‘Vertical Geopolitics: Baghdad and After’, Antipode, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 12–23, 2004, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2004.00379.x.
[97]
S. Graham, ‘Remember Fallujah: Demonising Place, Constructing Atrocity’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2005, doi: 10.1068/d2301ed.
[98]
S. Graham, ‘Cities and the “War on Terror”’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 255–276, 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00665.x.
[99]
S. Graham, Cities Under Siege: The New Military Urbanism, Pbk. ed. London: Verso, 2011.
[100]
K. Iveson, ‘The Wars on Graffiti and the New Military Urbanism’, City, vol. 14, no. 1–2, pp. 115–134, 2010, doi: 10.1080/13604810903545783.
[101]
R. Warren, ‘Situating the City and September 11th: Military Urban Doctrine, “Pop-Up” Armies and Spatial Chess’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 614–619, 2002, doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.00404.
[102]
T. Angotti, ‘Apocalyptic Anti-Urbanism: Mike Davis and His Planet of Slums’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 961–967, 2006, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00705.x.
[103]
S. Bleibleh, ‘Walking Through Walls’, Space and Culture, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 156–170, 2015, doi: 10.1177/1206331213512919.
[104]
F. W. Boal, ‘Belfast: Walls Within’, Political Geography, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 687–694, 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(02)00013-6.
[105]
S. Brown, ‘Central Belfast’s Security Segment: An Urban Phenomenon’, Area, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1–9, 1985 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20002110
[106]
S. Fregonese, ‘The Urbicide of Beirut? Geopolitics and the Built Environment in the Lebanese Civil War (1975–1976)’, Political Geography, vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 309–318, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.07.005.
[107]
S. Graham, ‘Bulldozers and Bombs: The Latest Palestinian-Israeli Conflict as Asymmetric Urbicide’, Antipode, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 642–649, 2002, doi: 10.1111/1467-8330.00259.
[108]
S. Graham, ‘Lessons in Urbicide’, New Left Review, vol. 19, 2003 [Online]. Available: https://newleftreview.org/II/19/stephen-graham-lessons-in-urbicide
[109]
K. Hewitt, ‘“When the Great Planes Came and Made Ashes of Our City ...”1: Towards an Oral Geography of the Disasters of War.’, Antipode, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 1–34, 1994, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.1994.tb00229.x.
[110]
J. C. Scott, Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.
[111]
J. C. Scott, Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed, Veritas paperback edition. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2020.
[112]
K. Tierney, ‘Disaster as War: Militarism and the Social Construction of Disaster in New Orleans’, in The Sociology of Katrina: Perspectives on a Modern Catastrophe, 2nd ed., Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2007.
[113]
K. Teirney, ‘Disaster as War: Militarism and the Social Construction of Disaster in New Orleans’, in The Sociology of Katrina: Perspectives on a Modern Catastrophe, 2nd ed., Lanham, Md: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2007 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy01.rhul.ac.uk/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1791197
[114]
E. Weizman, Hollow Land: Israel’s Architecture of Occupation. London: Verso, 2012.
[115]
E. Weizman, ‘Walking Through Walls’, Radical Philosophy, vol. 136, pp. 8–22, 2006.
[116]
E. Weizman, ‘Introduction to The Politics of Verticality | openDemocracy’, 2002. [Online]. Available: https://www.opendemocracy.net/ecology-politicsverticality/article_801.jsp
[117]
P. Adey, ‘Mobilities: Politics, Practices, Places’, in Introducing Human Geographies, 3rd edition., Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2013.
[118]
P. Adey, ‘Mobilities: Politics, Practices, Places’, in Introducing Human Geographies, P. Cloke, Ed. 2013 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.royalholloway.idm.oclc.org/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=1524169
[119]
J. Coaffee and P. Rogers, ‘Rebordering the City for New Security Challenges: From Counter-Terrorism to Community Resilience’, Space and Polity, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 101–118, 2008, doi: 10.1080/13562570801969556.
[120]
S. Graham, ‘"Homeland” Insecurities?’, Space and Culture, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 63–67, 2006, doi: 10.1177/1206331205283671.
[121]
N. Klein and N. Smith, ‘The Shock Doctrine: A Discussion.’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 582–595, 2008, doi: 10.1068/d2604ks.
[122]
M. Sheller, ‘The Islanding Effect: Post-Disaster Mobility Systems and Humanitarian Logistics in Haiti’, cultural geographies, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 185–204, 2013, doi: 10.1177/1474474012438828.
[123]
N. Smith, ‘There’s No Such Thing as a Natural Disaster | Items’, 2006. [Online]. Available: https://items.ssrc.org/understanding-katrina/theres-no-such-thing-as-a-natural-disaster/
[124]
G. Agamben, State of Exception. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005.
[125]
G. Agamben, State of Exception. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=547685
[126]
H. Bartling, ‘Suburbia, Mobility, and Urban Calamities’, Space and Culture, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 60–62, 2006, doi: 10.1177/1206331205283674.
[127]
D. Eggers, Zeitoun. London: Hamish Hamilton, 2010.
[128]
S. Graham, Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails, 1. publ. New York [u.a.]: Routledge, 2010.
[129]
S. Graham, Disrupted Cities: When Infrastructure Fails. New York: Routledge, 2010 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=452313
[130]
S. Graham, ‘Olympics 2012 Security’, City, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 446–451, 2012, doi: 10.1080/13604813.2012.696900.
[131]
S. Graham, ‘When Life Itself Is War: On the Urbanization of Military and Security Doctrine’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 136–155, 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01026.x.
[132]
A. Hartnell, ‘Katrina Tourism and a Tale of Two Cities: Visualizing Race and Class in New Orleans’, American QuarterlyThe Journal of American HistoryThe Journal of American FolkloreAmerican QuarterlyAmerican Quarterly, vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 723–747, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27735016
[133]
N. Klein, The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. London: Penguin, 2008.
[134]
A. Ramadan, ‘Destroying Nahr El-Bared: Sovereignty and Urbicide in the Space of Exception’, Political Geography, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 153–163, 2009, doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2009.02.004.
[135]
M. Shapiro and N. Bird-David, ‘Routinergency: Domestic Securitization in Contemporary Israel’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 637–655, 2017, doi: 10.1177/0263775816677550.
[136]
J. Walker, ‘Moving Testimonies and the Geography of Suffering: Perils and Fantasies of Belonging After Katrina’, Continuum, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 47–64, 2010, doi: 10.1080/10304310903380769.
[137]
H. Baumann, ‘Enclaves, Borders, and Everyday Movements: Palestinian Marginal Mobility in East Jerusalem’, Cities, vol. 59, pp. 173–182, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2015.10.012.
[138]
I. Braverman, ‘Civilized Borders: A Study of Israel’s New Crossing Administration’, Antipode, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 264–295, 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00773.x.
[139]
T. P. R. Caldeira, ‘Fortcified Enclaves: The New Urban Segregation’, Public Culture, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 303–328, 1996, doi: 10.1215/08992363-8-2-303.
[140]
T. P. do R. Caldeira, City of Walls: Crime, Segregation, and Citizenship in São Paulo. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.
[141]
M. Coy and M. Pöhler, ‘Gated Communities in Latin American Megacities: Case Studies in Brazil and Argentina’, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 355–370, 2002, doi: 10.1068/b2772x.
[142]
M. Coy, ‘Gated Communities and Urban Fragmentation in Latin America: The Brazilian Experience’, GeoJournalJournal of the SouthwestBuilt Environment (1978-)Development in PracticeThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 121–132, 2006 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41148071
[143]
D. Hook and M. Vrdoljak, ‘Gated Communities, Heterotopia and a "Rights” of Privilege: A `Heterotopology’ of the South African Security-Park’, Geoforum, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 195–219, 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0016-7185(01)00039-2.
[144]
S. A. Kaker, ‘Enclaves, Insecurity and Violence in Karachi’, South Asian History and Culture, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 93–107, 2014, doi: 10.1080/19472498.2013.863016.
[145]
R. Le Goix and C. J. Webster, ‘Gated Communities’, Geography Compass, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 1189–1214, 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00118.x.
[146]
S. Rosière and R. Jones, ‘Teichopolitics: Re-Considering Globalisation Through the Role of Walls and Fences’, Geopolitics, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 217–234, 2012, doi: 10.1080/14650045.2011.574653.
[147]
F. W. Boal, ‘Belfast: Walls Within’, Political Geography, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 687–694, 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0962-6298(02)00013-6.
[148]
L. Gayer, ‘The Need for Speed: Traffic Regulation and the Violent Fabric of Karachi’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 33, no. 7–8, pp. 137–158, 2016, doi: 10.1177/0263276416666934.
[149]
J. Grant and L. Mittelsteadt, ‘Types of Gated Communities’, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 913–930, 2004, doi: 10.1068/b3165.
[150]
A. Handel, ‘Gated/gating Community: The Settlement Complex in the West Bank’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 504–517, 2014, doi: 10.1111/tran.12045.
[151]
C. W. Herbert and M. J. Murray, ‘Building from Scratch: New Cities, Privatized Urbanism and the Spatial Restructuring of Johannesburg after Apartheid’, International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 471–494, 2015, doi: 10.1111/1468-2427.12180.
[152]
D. Hook and M. Vrdoljak, ‘Gated Communities, Heterotopia and a "Rights” of Privilege: A `Heterotopology’ of the South African Security-Park’, Geoforum, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 195–219, 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0016-7185(01)00039-2.
[153]
R. Jones, ‘Border Security, 9/11 and the Enclosure of Civilisation’, The Geographical Journal, vol. 177, no. 3, pp. 213–217, 2011 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41238040
[154]
K. Landman and M. Schönteich, ‘Urban Fortresses’, African Security Review, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 71–85, 2002, doi: 10.1080/10246029.2002.9628147.
[155]
R. E. Lang and K. A. Danielsen, ‘Gated Communities in America: Walling Out the World?’, Housing Policy Debate, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 867–899, 1997, doi: 10.1080/10511482.1997.9521281.
[156]
C. Lemanski, ‘A New Apartheid? the Spatial Implications of Fear of Crime in Cape Town, South Africa’, Environment and Urbanization, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 101–112, 2004, doi: 10.1177/095624780401600201.
[157]
M. J. Murray, ‘The Spatial Dynamics of Postmodern Urbanism: Social Polarisation and Fragmentation in Saão Paulo and Johannesburg’, Journal of Contemporary African Studies, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 139–164, 2004, doi: 10.1080/cjca0258900042000229999.
[158]
M. J. Murray, ‘Waterfall City (Johannesburg): Privatized Urbanism in Extremis’, Environment and Planning A, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 503–520, 2015, doi: 10.1068/a140038p.
[159]
C.-P. Pow, ‘Securing the “Civilised” Enclaves: Gated Communities and the Moral Geographies of Exclusion in (Post-)socialist Shanghai’, Urban Studies, vol. 44, no. 8, pp. 1539–1558, 2007, doi: 10.1080/00420980701373503.
[160]
J. Rokem and L. Vaughan, ‘Segregation, Mobility and Encounters in Jerusalem: The Role of Public Transport Infrastructure in Connecting the “Divided City”’, Urban Studies, 2017, doi: 10.1177/0042098017691465.
[161]
O. Yiftachel and H. Yacobi, ‘Urban Ethnocracy: Ethnicization and the Production of Space in an Israeli “Mixed City”’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 673–693, 2003, doi: 10.1068/d47j.
[162]
P. Adey, ‘Air/Atmospheres of the Megacity’, Theory, Culture & Society, vol. 30, no. 7–8, pp. 291–308, 2013, doi: 10.1177/0263276413501541.
[163]
D. Banister, ‘Cities, Mobility and Climate Change’, Journal of Transport Geography, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 1538–1546, 2011, doi: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.03.009.
[164]
T. Choy, ‘Air’s Substantiations. In Paper for Berkeley Environmental Politics Colloquium.’ 2010 [Online]. Available: http://globetrotter.berkeley.edu/bwep/colloquium/papers/ChoyAirEP.pdf
[165]
M. Gandy, ‘Urban Atmospheres’, Cultural Geographies, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 353–374, 2017, doi: 10.1177/1474474017712995.
[166]
D. A. Ghertner, ‘Nuisance Talk and the Propriety of Property: Middle Class Discourses of a Slum-Free Delhi’, Antipode, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 1161–1187, 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00956.x.
[167]
D. A. Ghertner, ‘Calculating Without Numbers: Aesthetic Governmentality in Delhi’s Slums’, Economy and Society, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 185–217, 2010, doi: 10.1080/03085141003620147.
[168]
S. Graham, ‘Life Support: The Political Ecology of Urban Air’, City, vol. 19, no. 2–3, pp. 192–215, 2015, doi: 10.1080/13604813.2015.1014710.
[169]
R. Hitchings, ‘Air Conditioning and the Material Culture of Routine Human Encasement’, Journal of Material Culture, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 251–265, 2008, doi: 10.1177/1359183508095495.
[170]
M. Peterson, ‘Atmospheric Sensibilities’, Social Text, vol. 35, no. 2 131, pp. 69–90, 2017, doi: 10.1215/01642472-3820545.
[171]
M. Whitehead, State, Science and the Skies: Governmentalities of the British Atmosphere. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
[172]
T. Winter, ‘An Uncomfortable Truth: Air-Conditioning and Sustainability in Asia’, Environment and Planning A, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 517–531, 2013, doi: 10.1068/a45128.
[173]
S. Dennis, Smokefree: A Social, Moral and Political Atmosphere. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2016.
[174]
S. Engelmann, ‘Toward a Poetics of Air: Sequencing and Surfacing Breath’, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 430–444, 2015, doi: 10.1111/tran.12084.
[175]
M. Nieuwenhuis, ‘Breathing Materiality: Aerial Violence at a Time of Atmospheric Politics’, Critical Studies on Terrorism, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 499–521, 2016, doi: 10.1080/17539153.2016.1199420.
[176]
M. Nieuwenhuis, ‘The Governing of the Air: A Case Study of the Chinese Experience’, Borderlands, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 2016 [Online]. Available: https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&u=rho_ttda&id=GALE|A499577270&v=2.1&it=r
[177]
A. Feigenbaum and D. Weissmann, ‘Vulnerable Warriors: The Atmospheric Marketing of Military and Policing Equipment Before and After 9/11’, Critical Studies on Terrorism, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 482–498, 2016, doi: 10.1080/17539153.2016.1197642.
[178]
D. A. Ghertner, ‘Does Violence Have a Signature?’, Urban Geography, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 343–347, 2016, doi: 10.1080/02723638.2015.1079096.
[179]
R. Hitchings, ‘Researching Air-Conditioning Addiction and Ways of Puncturing Practice: Professional Office Workers and the Decision to Go Outside’, Environment and Planning A, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 2838–2856, 2011, doi: 10.1068/a43574.
[180]
A. Closs Stephens, ‘Urban Atmospheres: Feeling Like a City?’, International Political Sociology, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 99–101, 2015, doi: 10.1111/ips.12082.
[181]
G. Walker, ‘How Does Air Conditioning Become “Needed”? a Case Study of Routes, Rationales and Dynamics’, Energy Research & Social Science, vol. 4, pp. 1–9, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2014.08.002.
[182]
G. Bruno, ‘Ramble City: Postmodernism and “Blade Runner”’, October, vol. 41, 1987, doi: 10.2307/778330.
[183]
R. Burrows, ‘Virtual Culture, Urban Social Polarisation and Social Science Fiction’, in The Governance of Cyberspace: Politics, Technology and Global Restructuring, London: Routledge, 1997.
[184]
R. Burrows, ‘Virtual Culture, Urban Social Polarisation and Social Science Fiction’, in The Governance of Cyberspace: Politics, Technology and Global Restructuring, London: Routledge, 1997, pp. 35–42 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=179813
[185]
M. Davis, Beyond Bladerunner: Urban Control, the Ecology of Fear. .
[186]
J. R. Gold, ‘Under Darkened Skies: The City in Science-Fiction Film’, GeographyScience Fiction StudiesBuilt Environment (1978-)CR: The New Centennial ReviewLuso-Brazilian Review, vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 337–345, 2001 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40573613
[187]
S. Graham, ‘Vertical Noir: Histories of the Future in Urban Science Fiction’, City, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 389–406, 2016, doi: 10.1080/13604813.2016.1170489.
[188]
D. Harvey, The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry Into the Origins of Cultural Change. Cambridge, Mass: Blackwell, 1990.
[189]
L. Hewitt and S. Graham, ‘Vertical Cities: Representations of Urban Verticality in 20th-Century Science Fiction Literature’, Urban Studies, vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 923–937, 2015, doi: 10.1177/0042098014529345.
[190]
R. Kitchin and J. Kneale, ‘Science Fiction or Future Fact? Exploring Imaginative Geographies of the New Millennium’, Progress in Human Geography, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 19–35, 2001, doi: 10.1191/030913201677411564.
[191]
N. M. Klein, ‘Building Blade Runner’, Social Text, no. 28, 1991, doi: 10.2307/466383.
[192]
P. Marks, ‘Imagining Surveillance: Utopian Visions and Surveillance Studies’, Surveillance & Society, vol. 3, no. 2/3, 2005 [Online]. Available: https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/3503
[193]
G. MacLeod, ‘Spaces of Utopia and Dystopia: Landscaping the Contemporary City’, Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 153–170, 2002 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3554313
[194]
W. K. Yuen, ‘On the Edge of Spaces: “Blade Runner”, “Ghost in the Shell”, and Hong Kong’s Cityscape’, Science Fiction Studies, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–21, 2000 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4240846
[195]
J. G. Ballard, High-Rise. London: 4th Estate, 2016.
[196]
A. Butt, ‘Vicarious Vertigo: The Emotional Experience of Height in the Science Fiction City’, Emotion, Space and Society, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.emospa.2017.04.001.
[197]
D. B. Clarke, The Cinematic City. London: Routledge, 1997.
[198]
D. B. Clarke, The Cinematic City. London: Routledge, 1997.
[199]
D. Cunningham and A. Warwick, ‘Unnoticed Apocalypse’, City, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 433–448, 2013, doi: 10.1080/13604813.2013.812345.
[200]
W. Gibson, Virtual Light. London: Penguin Books, 2011.
[201]
D. Kirby, ‘The Future Is Now: Diegetic Prototypes and the Role of Popular Films in Generating Real-World Technological Development’, Social Studies of ScienceWomen’s Studies QuarterlyJournal of Management Information SystemsRevue française d’études américainesStyle, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 41–70, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/27793341
[202]
R. Kitchin and J. Kneale, Lost in Space: Geographies of Science Fiction. (London): Continuum, 2002.
[203]
R. Kitchin and J. Kneale, Lost in Space: Geographies of Science Fiction. London: Continuum, 2002 [Online]. Available: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=436089
[204]
J. Kneale, ‘Plots: Space, Conspiracy, and Contingency in William Gibson’s Pattern Recognition and Spook Country’, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 169–186, 2011, doi: 10.1068/d10509.
[205]
R. Lippert, ‘New Urban Surveillance: Technology, Mobility, and Diversity in 21st Century Cities’, Surveillance & Society, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 257–262, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/urban_ed
[206]
L. Muir, ‘“Control Space?: Cinematic Representations of Surveillance Space Between Discipline and Control”’, Surveillance & Society, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 263–279, 2012 [Online]. Available: https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/control_space
[207]
A. Nel, ‘The Repugnant Appeal of the Abject: Cityscape and Cinematic Corporality In District 9’, Critical Arts, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 547–569, 2012, doi: 10.1080/02560046.2012.723845.
[208]
K. Palmås, ‘Predicting What You’ll Do Tomorrow: Panspectric Surveillance and the Contemporary Corporation’, Surveillance & Society, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 338–354, 2011 [Online]. Available: https://ojs.library.queensu.ca/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/4168
[209]
D. L. Pike, Subterranean Cities: The World Beneath Paris and London, 1800-1945. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2005.
[210]
D. L. Pike, ‘The Walt Disney World Underground’, Space and Culture, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 47–65, 2005, doi: 10.1177/1206331204269432.
[211]
M. J. van Veuren, ‘Tooth and Nail: Anxious Bodies in Neill Blomkamp’s’, Critical Arts, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 570–586, 2012, doi: 10.1080/02560046.2012.723847.
[212]
C. Weber, ‘Securitising the Unconscious: The Bush Doctrine of Preemption And Minority Report’, Geopolitics, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 482–499, 2005, doi: 10.1080/14650040591003499.
[213]
H. G. Wells, The Sleeper Awakes. London: Penguin Classics, 2005.
