Adler, E. (2008) ‘The Spread of Security Communities: Communities of Practice, Self-Restraint, and NATO’s Post--Cold War Transformation’, European Journal of International Relations, 14(2), pp. 195–230. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066108089241.
Aron, R. (1966) Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Ashley, R.K. (1984) ‘The Poverty of Neorealism’, International Organization, 38(02). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300026709.
Autesserre, S. (2009) ‘Hobbes and the Congo: Frames, Local Violence, and International Intervention’, International Organization, 63(02). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818309090080.
Aydinli, E. and Mathews, J. (2008) ‘Periphery Theorising for a Truly Internationalised Discipline: Spinning IR Theory Out of Anatolia’, Review of International Studies, 34(04). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210508008231.
Bagby, L.M.J. (1994) ‘The Use and Abuse of Thucydides in International Relations’, International Organization, 48(01). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300000849.
Baldwin, D.A. (1993) ‘Neoliberalism, Neorealism, and World Politics’, in Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 3–28.
Barkawi, T. and Laffey, M. (2002) ‘Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 31(1), pp. 109–127. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310010601.
Bellamy, A.J. (2004a) International Society and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397721050002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670.
Bellamy, A.J. (2004b) International Society and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397655180002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670.
Bellamy, A.J. (2005a) International Society and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397529850002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670.
Bellamy, A.J. (2005b) International Society and Its Critics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available at: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397720990002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670.
Berki, R.N. (1971) ‘On Marxian Thought and the Problem of International Relations’, World Politics, 24(01), pp. 80–105. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2009707.
Brown, C. (1995a) ‘International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way?’, Review of International Studies, 21(02). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500117619.
Brown, C. (1995b) ‘International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way?’, Review of International Studies, 21(02). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500117619.
Brown, W. (1992) ‘Finding the Man in the State’, Feminist Studies, 18(1). Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3178212.
Bull, H. (1971) ‘Order vs. Justice in International Society’, Political Studies, 19(3), pp. 269–283. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1971.tb00674.x.
Bull, H. (1990) ‘The Importance of Grotius in the Study of International Relations’, in Hugo Grotius and International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon, pp. 65–94. Available at: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13407032680002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670.
Bull, H. (2012) The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. 4th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Burnham, P. (1994) ‘Open Marxism and Vulgar International Political Economy’, Review of International Political Economy, 1(2), pp. 221–231. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09692299408434277.
Burnham, P. (1998) ‘The Communist Manifesto as International Relations Theory’, in The Communist Manifesto: New Interpretations. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Buzan, B. (2004a) From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397655150002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670.
Buzan, B. (2004b) From International to World Society?: English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397655140002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670.
Callinicos, A. (2002) ‘The Actuality of Imperialism’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 31(2), pp. 319–326. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310020601.
Campbell, D. (1993) Politics Without Principle: Sovereignty, Ethics, and the Narratives of the Gulf War. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Campbell, D. (1996) ‘Political Prosaics, Transversal Politics and the Anarchical World’, in Challenging Boundaries: Global Flows, Territorial Identities. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press.
Carr, E.H. (1999) ‘The Nature of Politics’, in International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond. 3rd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, pp. 562–566.
Carr, E.H. and Cox, M. (2001) The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919-1939: An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Carver, T. (2004) ‘War of the Worlds/Invasion of the Body Snatchers’, International Affairs (Royal Institute Of International Affairs 1944-), 80(1).
Carver, T., Cochran, M. and Squires, J. (1998) ‘Gendering Jones: Feminisms, IRs, Masculinities’, Review Of International Studies, 24(2). Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097523.
Chase-Dunn, C. (1981) ‘Interstate System and Capitalist World-Economy: One Logic or Two?’, International Studies Quarterly, 25(1), pp. 19–42. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2600209.
Claude, I.L. (2012) Power and International Relations. New York: Random House.
Cox, Robert.W. (1983) ‘Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations : An Essay in Method’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 12(2), pp. 162–175. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298830120020701.
Cox, R.W. (1986) ‘Social Forces, States and World Order’, in Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 204–254.
Cutler, C. (1999) ‘Locating “Authority” in the Global Political Economy’, International Studies Quarterly, 43(1), pp. 59–81.
Darby, P. (2003) ‘Reconfiguring “The International” Knowledge Machines, Boundaries, and Exclusions’, Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 28(1).
Darby, P. (2004) ‘Pursuing the Political: A Postcolonial Rethinking of Relations International’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33(1).
De Goede, M. (2008) ‘The Politics of Preemption and the War on Terror in Europe’, European Journal of International Relations, 14(1), pp. 161–185. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107087764.
der Derian, J. (1989) ‘“The Boundaries of Knowledge and Power in International Relations” In: International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics’, in International/Intertextual Relations: Postmodern Readings of World Politics. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.
Deudney, D. and Ikenberry, G.J. (1999) ‘The Nature and Sources of Liberal International Order’, Review Of International Studies, 25(2), pp. 179–196. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097589.
Devetek, R. (2005) ‘Critical Theory’, in Theories of International Relations. 3rd Edition. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 137–160. Available at: http://lib.myilibrary.com/Open.aspx?id=85685.
Doty, R.L. (1993) ‘Foreign Policy as Social Construction: A Post-Positivist Analysis of U.S. Counterinsurgency Policy in the Philippines’, International Studies Quarterly, 37(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2600810.
Dougherty, J.E. and Pfaltzgraff, R.L. (2001) Contending Theories of International Relations: A Comprehensive Survey. 5th ed. New York: Longman.
Doyle, M.W. (1983) ‘Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs’, Philosophy & Public Affairs, 12(3), pp. 205–235. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2265298.
Doyle, M.W. (1986a) ‘Liberalism and World Politics’, American Political Science Review, 80(04), pp. 1151–1169. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1960861.
Doyle, M.W. (1986b) ‘Liberalism and World Politics’, American Political Science Review, 80(04), pp. 1151–1169. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1960861.
Doyle, M.W. (1990) ‘Thucydidean Realism’, Review of International Studies, 16(03). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500112483.
Dunne, T. (1995) ‘International Society: Theoretical Promises Fulfilled?’, Cooperation and Conflict, 30(2), pp. 125–154. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836795030002002.
Dunne, T., Kurki, M. and Smith, S. (eds) (2016) International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Fourth edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Edkins, J. (1999) Poststructuralism & International Relations: Bringing the Political Back In. Boulder, Colo: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Edkins, J. and Zehfuss, M. (2005) ‘Generalising the International’, Review of International Studies, 31(03). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210505006583.
Enloe, C. (1993a) ‘Are Un Peacekeepers Real Men? and Other Post-Cold War Puzzles’, in The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 10–37.
Enloe, C. (1993b) ‘Bananas Militarized and Demilitarized’, in The Morning After: Sexual Politics at the End of the Cold War. Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 102–141.
Enloe, C. (2004) ‘“Gender” Is Not Enough: The Need for a Feminist Consciousness’, International Affairs, 80(1). Available at: http://findit.royalholloway.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/openurl?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft.jtitle=International+Affairs&rft.atitle=%27Gender%27+Is+Not+Enough%3A+The+Need+for+a+Feminist+Consciousness&rft.volume=80&rft.issn=00205850&rft.issue=1&rft.date=2004&rft.aufirst=Cynthia&rft.aulast=Enloe&vid=44ROY_Services_page&institution=44ROY&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true.
Enloe, C.H. (2000) Bananas, Beaches and Bases: Making Feminist Sense of International Politics. Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press.
Epstein, C. (2008) The Power of Words in International Relations: Birth of an Anti-Whaling Discourse. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Fanon, F. et al. (2021) The Wretched of the Earth. 60th anniversary edition. New York: Grove Press.
Forde, S. (1992) ‘Varieties of Realism: Thucydides and Machiavelli’, The Journal of Politics, 54(2), pp. 372–393. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2132031.
Foucault, M. (1991) ‘What Is An Author?’, in The Foucault Reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 101–120.
Fukuyama, F. (1989) ‘The End of History?’, The National Interest, (16), pp. 3–18. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/24027184.
Gale, F. (1998) ‘Cave ’Cave! Hic Dragones’ : A Neo-Gramscian Deconstruction and Reconstruction of International Regime Theory’, Review of International Political Economy, 5(2), pp. 252–283. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/096922998347561.
Gamble, A. (1999) ‘Marxism After Communism: Beyond Realism and Historicism’, Review Of International Studies, 25(5), pp. 27–144.
Garst, D. (1989) ‘Thucydides and Neorealism’, International Studies Quarterly, 33(1), pp. 3–27. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600491.
Genest, M.A. (2004) Conflict and Cooperation: Evolving Theories of International Relations. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.
Germain, R.D. and Kenny, M. (1998) ‘Engaging Gramsci: International Relations Theory and the New Gramscians’, Review Of International Studies, 24(1).
Gill, S. (1993a) Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gill, S. (1993b) Gramsci, Historical Materialism and International Relations. Cambridge [England]: Cambridge University Press. Available at: http://eu.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/action/uresolver.do?operation=resolveService&package_service_id=13397720900002671&institutionId=2671&customerId=2670.
Gill, S. and Law, D. (1988) ‘Marxism and the World System’, in The Global Political Economy: Perspectives, Problems, and Policies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 54–70.
Gill, S.R. and Law, D. (1989) ‘Global Hegemony and the Structural Power of Capital’, International Studies Quarterly, 33(4), pp. 475–199.
Gills, B.K. (1987) ‘Historical Materialism and International Relations Theory’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 16(2), pp. 265–270. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298870160020301.
Gilpin, R. (2002a) ‘The Rise of American Hegemony’, in Britain 1846-1914 and the United States 1941-2001. Ashgate Pub Ltd.
Gilpin, R. (2002b) ‘The Rise of American Hegemony’, in Two Hegemonies: Britain 1846-1914 and the United States 1941-2001. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Ltd., pp. 165–182. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20130323092826/https://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/intrel/ipe/gilpin.htm.
Gilpin, R. and Gilpin, J.M. (1987) The Political Economy of International Relations. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Gilpin, R.G. (1984) ‘The Richness of the Tradition of Political Realism’, International Organization, 38(02). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300026710.
Gilpin, R.G. (1996) ‘No One Loves a Political Realist’, Security Studies, 5(3), pp. 3–26.
Goldgeier, J.M. and McFaul, M. (1992) ‘A Tale of Two Worlds: Core and Periphery in the Post-Cold War Era’, International Organization, 46(02). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027788.
Grieco, J.M. (1993) ‘Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism’, in Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 116–142.
Grotius, H. and Campbell, A.C. (1814) On the Laws of War and Peace. London. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20171020013519/http://www.constitution.org/gro/djbp.htm.
Grotius, H. and Neff, S.C. (2012) Hugo Grotius on the Law of War and Peace. Student ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grovogui, S.N. (2002) ‘Regimes of Sovereignty: International Morality and the African Condition’, European Journal of International Relations, 8(3), pp. 315–338.
Grunberg, I. (1990) ‘Exploring the "Myth” of Hegemonic Stability’, International Organization, 44(04). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300035372.
Gusterson, H. (2005) ‘Nuclear Weapons and the Other in the Western Imagination’, in People of the Bomb: Portraits of America’s Nuclear Complex. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 21–47.
H. Herz, J. (1957) ‘Rise and Demise of The Territorial State’, World Politics, 9(4), pp. 473–493. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2009421?sid=primo&origin=crossref&seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
Halliday, F. (1994) ‘A Necessary Encounter: Historical Materialism and International Relations’, in Rethinking International Relations. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Haslam, J. (2002) No Virtue Like Necessity: Realist Thought in International Relations Since Machiavelli. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Herz, J.H. (1942) ‘Power Politics and World Organization’, The American Political Science Review, 36(6). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/1949064.
Hobbes, T. (1999) ‘The Natural Conditions of Mankind’, in International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond. 3rd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, pp. 94–98.
Hobson, J.M. (2005) ‘The Enduring Place of Hierarchy in World Politics: Tracing the Social Logics of Hierarchy and Political Change’, European Journal of International Relations, 11(1), pp. 63–98. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066105050137.
Hoffmann, S. (1977) ‘An American Social Science: International Relations’, Daedalus, 106(3), pp. 41–60. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20024493.
Hoffmann, S. (1987a) ‘An American Social Science: International Relations’, in Janus and Minerva: Essays in the Theory and Practice of International Politics. Boulder: Westview, pp. 219–221.
Hoffmann, S. (1987b) ‘Liberalism and International Affairs’, in Janus and Minerva: Essays in the Theory and Practice of International Politics. Boulder, pp. 394–417.
Hopf, T. (1998) ‘The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory’, International Security, 23(1), pp. 171–200. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2539267.
Howe, P. (1994) ‘The Utopian Realism of E. H. Carr’, Review of International Studies, 20(3), pp. 277–297. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500118078.
Hurrell, A. (2003) ‘Order and Justice in International Relations: What is at Stake?’, in Order and Justice in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ikenberry, G.J. (2009a) ‘Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order’, Perspectives on Politics, 7(1), pp. 71–87. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709090112.
Ikenberry, G.J. (2009b) ‘Liberal Internationalism 3.0: America and the Dilemmas of Liberal World Order’, Perspectives on Politics, 7(01), pp. 71–87. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592709090112.
Jackson, R. and Sorensen, G. (2003) Introduction to International Relations: Theories and Approaches. Rev. and expanded 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
James, A. (1989) ‘The Realism of Realism: The State and the Study of International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 15(03). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500112847.
Jervis, R. (1999) ‘Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the Debate’, International Security, 24(1), pp. 42–63. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1162/016228899560040.
Jones, A. (1996) ‘Does “Gender” Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 22(04). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500118649.
Kant, I. (1970a) ‘An Answer to the Question: ‘What is Enlightenment?’’, in Kant’s Political Writings. London: Cambridge University Press.
Kant, I. (1970b) ‘Perpetual Peace: A Philosophical Sketch’, in Kant’s Political Writings. London: Cambridge University Press.
Katzenstein, P.J. (1996) The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kegley, C.W. and Blanton, S.L. (2011) World Politics: Trend and Transformation. Boston, Mass: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Keohane, R.O. (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Keohane, R.O. (1986) Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Keohane, R.O. (2005) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Available at: https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/rhul/detail.action?docID=5543821.
Keohane, R.O. and Nye, J.S. (1987) ‘Power and Interdependence Revisited’, International Organization, 41(04). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027661.
Keohane, R.O. and Nye, J.S. (1989) Power and Interdependence. 2nd ed. [S.l.]: HarperCollins.
Kindleberger, C.P. (1981) ‘Dominance and Leadership in the International Economy: Exploitation, Public Goods, and Free Rides’, International Studies Quarterly, 25(2). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2600355.
Krauthammer, C. (1992) ‘The Unipolar Moment’, in Rethinking America’s Security: Beyond Cold War to New World Order. 1st ed. New York: Norton, pp. 313–344.
Krebs, R.R. and Jackson, P.T. (2007) ‘Twisting Tongues and Twisting Arms: The Power of Political Rhetoric’, European Journal of International Relations, 13(1), pp. 35–66. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066107074284.
Krishna, S. (2001) ‘Race, Amnesia, and the Education of International Relations’, Alternatives, 26(4).
Lake, D.A. (1993) ‘Leadership, Hegemony, and the International Economy: Naked Emperor or Tattered Monarch With Potential?’, International Studies Quarterly, 37(4). Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600841.
Legro, J.W. and Moravcsik, A. (1999) ‘Is Anybody Still a Realist?’, International Security, 24(2), pp. 5–55. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2539248.
Lenin, V.I. (1963) Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism: A Popular Outline. Moscow: Progress Publishers. Available at: https://www.marxists.org/archive/lenin/works/1916/imp-hsc/.
Lenin, V.I. (1973a) Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism : A Popular Outline. Peking: Foreign Languages Press.
Lenin, V.I. (1973b) Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism : A Popular Outline. Peking: Foreign Languages Press.
Ling, L.H.M. (1996) ‘Hegemony and the Internationalizing State: A Post‐colonial Analysis of China’s Integration Into Asian Corporatism’, Review of International Political Economy, 3(1), pp. 1–26. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09692299608434343.
Linklater, A. (1986a) ‘Realism, Marxism and Critical International Theory’, Review of International Studies, 12(04). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500113865.
Linklater, A. (1986b) ‘Realism, Marxism and Critical International Theory’, Review of International Studies, 12(4), pp. 301–312. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500113865.
Linklater, A. (1997) ‘The Transformation of Political Community: E. H. Carr, Critical Theory and International Relations’, Review Of International Studies, 23(3).
Linklater, A. (2004) ‘Dominant and Destructive Masculinities’, International Affairs, 80(1). Available at: http://findit.royalholloway.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/openurl?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft.jtitle=International+Affairs&rft.atitle=Dominant+and+Destructive+Masculinities&rft.volume=80&rft.issn=00205850&rft.issue=1&rft.date=2004&rft.aufirst=Andrew&rft.aulast=Linklater&vid=44ROY_Services_page&institution=44ROY&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true.
Linklater, A. (2005) ‘Marxism’, in Theories of International Relations. 3rd Edition. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 110–136. Available at: http://lib.myilibrary.com/Open.aspx?id=85685.
Lynch, C. (1994) ‘E.H. Carr, International Relations Theory, and the Societal Origins of International Legal Norms’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 23(3), pp. 589–619. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298940230030801.
Macchiavell, N. (1996) ‘Excerpts from “The Prince” in Classics of International Relations’, in Classics of International Relations. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall, pp. 15–20.
Machiavelli, N. and Marriott, W.K. (1505) The Prince. Available at: https://web.archive.org/web/20060101054818/http://www.ilt.columbia.edu/publications/machiavelli.html.
MacLean, J. (1981) ‘Marxist Epistemology, Explanations of “Change” and the Study of International Relations’, in Change and the Study of International Relations: The Evaded Dimension. New York: St. Martin’s Press, pp. 46–67.
Maclean, J. (1988) ‘Marxism and International Relations: A Strange Case of Mutual Neglect’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 17(2), pp. 295–319. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170021201.
Marx, K., Engels, F. and Tucker, R.C. (1978a) ‘Economic and Philosophic Manuscript of 1844’, in The Marx-Engels Reader. 2d ed. New York: Norton, pp. 66–125.
Marx, K., Engels, F. and Tucker, R.C. (1978b) ‘Wage, Labour and Capital’, in The Marx-Engels Reader. 2d ed. New York: Norton, pp. 203–217.
Marx, K., Engels, F. and Tucker, R.C. (1978c) ‘Wage, Labour and Capital’, in The Marx-Engels Reader. 2d ed. New York: Norton, pp. 203–217.
Marx, K. and Tucker, R.C. (1978a) ‘Economic and Philosophic Manuscript of 1844’, in The Marx-Engels Reader. 2d ed. New York: Norton, pp. 66–125.
Marx, K. and Tucker, R.C. (1978b) ‘Theories of Surplus Value’, in The Marx-Engels Reader. 2d ed. New York: Norton, pp. 443–468.
Mastanduno, M. (1997) ‘Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and U.S. Grand Strategy After the Cold War’, International Security, 21(4). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2539283.
McClintock, A. (1992) ‘The Angel of Progress: Pitfalls of the Term “Post-Colonialism”’, Social Text [Preprint], (31/32). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/466219.
McKeown, T.J. (1983) ‘Hegemonic Stability Theory and 19th Century Tariff Levels in Europe’, International Organization, 37(01). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300004203.
Mearsheimer, J.J. (1994) ‘The False Promise of International Institutions’, International Security, 19(3). Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2539078.
Mearsheimer, J.J. (2005) ‘E.H. Carr vs. Idealism: The Battle Rages On’, International Relations, 19(2), pp. 139–152. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0047117805052810.
Merrington, J. (1978) ‘Theory and Practice in Gramsci’s Marxism’, in Western Marxism: A Critical Reader. London: Verso, pp. 140–175.
Milliken, Jennifer (1999) ‘The Study of Discourse in International Relations: A Critique of Research and Methods’, European Journal of International Relations, 5(2).
Milner, H. (1992) ‘International Theories of Cooperation Among Nations: Strengths and Weaknesses’, World Politics, 44(03), pp. 466–496. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2010546.
Modelski, G. (1978) ‘The Long Cycle of Global Politics and the Nation-State’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 20(02). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500008914.
Moravcsik, A. (1997) ‘Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics’, International Organization, 52(1). Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2601333.
Morgenthau, H. (1948) ‘The Political Science of E. H. Carr’, World Politics, 1(1), pp. 127–134. Available at: https://doi.org/10.2307/2009162.
Morgenthau, H.J. (1974) Scientific Man vs. Power Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Morgenthau, H.J. (2006a) ‘A Realist Theory of International Politics’, in Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 7th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Morgenthau, H.J. (2006b) ‘Different Methods of the Balance of Power’, in Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 7th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Morgenthau, H.J. (2006c) ‘The Balance of Power’, in Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. 7th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
Morton, Adam David, B., Andreas ;, Bieler, A. and Morton, A.D. (2001) ‘The Gordian Knot of Agency-Structure in International Relations: A Neo-Gramscian Perspective’, European Journal of International Relations, 7(1).
Murphy, C.N. (1998) ‘Understanding IR: Understanding Gramsci’, Review Of International Studies, 24(3).
Neumann, I.B. (2008) ‘The Body of the Diplomat’, European Journal of International Relations, 14(4), pp. 671–695. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066108097557.
Niebuhr, R. (2005) Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics. London: Continuum.
ÓTuathail, G. (2002) ‘Theorizing Practical Geopolitical Reasoning: The Case of the United States’ Response to the War in Bosnia’, Political Geography, 21(5), pp. 601–628. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(02)00009-4.
Palan, R.P. and Blair, B.M. (1993) ‘On the Idealist Origins of the Realist Theory of International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 19(04). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500118273.
Paul, T.V. (2016) ‘Recasting Statecraft - International Relations and Strategies of Peaceful Change’. Atlanta. Available at: http://www.tvpaul.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/ISA_Presidential_Address.pdf.
Powell, R. (1994) ‘Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate’, International Organization, 48(02). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300028204.
Price, R. and Reus-Smit, C. (1998) ‘Dangerous Liaisons? Critical International Theory and Constructivism’, European Journal of International Relations, 4(3).
Reus-Smit, C. (2005) ‘Constructivism’, in Theories of International Relations. 3rd Edition. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 188–212. Available at: http://lib.myilibrary.com/Open.aspx?id=85685.
Rosecrance, R. (1987) ‘Long Cycle Theory and International Relations’, International Organization, 41(2), pp. 283–301. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027478.
Rosenberg, J. (1996) ‘Isaac Deutscher and the Lost History of International Relations’, New Left Review [Preprint], (215). Available at: https://newleftreview.org/issues/I215/articles/justin-rosenberg-isaac-deutscher-and-the-lost-history-of-international-relations.
Ruggie, J.G. (1982) ‘International Regimes, Transactions, and Change: Embedded Liberalism in the Postwar Economic Order’, International Organization, 36(02). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018993.
Ruggie, J.G. (1998) ‘What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo-Utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge’, International Organization, 52(4).
Rupert, M. (1995) Producing Hegemony: The Politics of Mass Production and American Global Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Said, E. (1991) ‘The Scope of Orientalism’, in Orientalism. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Santos, T.D. (1970) ‘The Structure of Dependence’, American Economic Review, 60(2), pp. 231–236.
Shaw, M. (2002) ‘Post-Imperial and Quasi-Imperial: State and Empire in the Global Era’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 31(2), pp. 327–336. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298020310020701.
Simmons, B.A. and Hopkins, D.J. (2005) ‘The Constraining Power of International Treaties: Theory and Methods’, American Political Science Review, 99(04). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051920.
Skjelsbæk, I. (no date) ‘Sexual Violence and War: Mapping Out a Complex Relationship’, European Journal of International Relations, 7(2). Available at: http://findit.royalholloway.ac.uk/primo_library/libweb/action/openurl?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft.jtitle=European+Journal+of+International+Relations&rft.atitle=Sexual+Violence+and+War%3A+Mapping+Out+a+Complex+Relationship&rft.volume=7&rft.issn=13540661&rft.issue=2&rft.aufirst=Inger&rft.aulast=Skjelsb%C3%A6k&vid=44ROY_Services_page&institution=44ROY&url_ctx_val=&url_ctx_fmt=null&isSerivcesPage=true.
Slater, D. (1998) ‘Post-Colonial Questions for Global Times’, Review of International Political Economy, 5(4), pp. 647–678. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/096922998347417.
Slaughter, A.-M. (2004) A New World Order. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Smith, M.J. (1986) Realist Thought From Weber to Kissinger. London.
Snidal, D. (1985) ‘The Limits of Hegemonic Stability Theory’, International Organization, 39(04). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830002703X.
Sterling-Folker, J. (2000) ‘Competing Paradigms or Birds of a Feather? Constructivism and Neoliberal Institutionalism Compared’, International Studies Quarterly, 44(1), pp. 97–119. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00150.
Stern, M. and Zalewski, M. (2009) ‘Feminist Fatigue(s): Reflections on Feminism and Familiar Fables of Militarisation’, Review of International Studies, 35(03). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210509008675.
Thucydides (1954) ‘The Melian Dialogue’, in History of the Peloponnesian war. Harmondsworth: Penguin, pp. 400–408.
Thucydides (1996) ‘The Melian Dialogue’, in Classics of International Relations. 3rd Edition. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice Hall, pp. 84–90.
Thucydides and Crawley, R. (no date) History of the Peloponnesian War. Available at: http://people.ucalgary.ca/~vandersp/Courses/texts/thucydi1.html.
Tickner, J.A. (1988) ‘Hans Morgenthau’s Principles of Political Realism: A Feminist Reformulation’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 17(3), pp. 429–440. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170030801.
Tickner, J.A. (1997) ‘You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements Between Feminists and IR Theorists’, International Studies Quarterly, 41(4), pp. 611–632. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600855?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents.
True, J. (2005) ‘Feminism’, in Theories of International Relations. 3rd Edition. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 213–234. Available at: http://lib.myilibrary.com/Open.aspx?id=85685.
Vasquez, J.A. (1998) The Power of Power Politics: From Classical Realism to Neotraditionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Vincent, R.J. (1988) ‘Hedley Bull and Order in International Politics’, Millennium - Journal of International Studies, 17(2), pp. 195–213. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298880170020701.
Viotti, P.R. and Kauppi, M.V. (1999) ‘Realism: The State, Power and the Balance of Power’, in International Relations Theory: Realism, Pluralism, Globalism, and Beyond. 3rd ed. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, pp. 35–67.
Wallerstein, I. (1974a) The Modern World-System Vol. 1: Capitalist Agriculture and the Origins of the European World-Economy in the Sixteenth Century. New York: Academic.
Wallerstein, I. (1974b) ‘The Rise and Future Demise of the World Capitalist System: Concepts for Comparative Analysis’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 16(4), pp. 387–415. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500007520.
Wallerstein, I. (1983) ‘The Three Instances of Hegemony in the History of the Capitalist World-Economy’, Comparative Sociology, 24(1), pp. 100–108. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1163/156854283X00071.
Waltz, K.N. (1979) Theory of International Politics. London: McGraw-Hill.
Waltz, K.N. (2001) Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis. New ed. New York: Columbia University Press.
Wendt, A. (1992) ‘Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organization, 46(2), pp. 391–425. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300027764.
Wilson, P. (1998) ‘The Myth of the “First Great Debate”’, Review of International Studies, 24(4), pp. 1–15. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20097558.
Wilson, W. (2014) ‘The World Must be Made Safe for Democracy: The Fourteen Points’, in K.A. Mingst and J.L. Snyder (eds.) (eds) Essential Readings in World Politics. Fifth Edition. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, pp. 4–6.
Wolfers, A. (1962) Discord and Collaboration: Essays on International Politics. London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Youngs, G. (2004) ‘Feminist International Relations: A Contradiction in Terms? Or: Why Women and Gender Are Essential to Understanding the World “We” Live In*’, International Affairs, 80(1), pp. 75–87. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2346.2004.00367.x.
Zacher, M.W. and Matthew, R.A. (1995) ‘Liberal International Theory: Common Threads, Divergent Strands’, in Controversies in International Relations Theory: Realism and the Neo-Liberal Challenge. Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 107–150.
