Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-gtxcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-17T09:08:49.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Insect–mycorrhizal interactions: patterns, processes, and consequences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2009

By
Alan C. Gange
Edited by
Takayuki Ohgushi ,
Timothy P. Craig  and
Peter W. Price
Alan C. Gange
Affiliation:
Royal Holloway, University of London
Takayuki Ohgushi
Affiliation:
Kyoto University, Japan
Timothy P. Craig
Affiliation:
University of Minnesota, Duluth
Peter W. Price
Affiliation:
Northern Arizona University
Get access

Summary

Introduction

A wide variety of fungi form an intimate association with the roots of plants, and the word “mycorrhiza” is used to describe the overall structure formed by the union of these partners. There are seven different types of mycorrhiza, but the two that are most abundant in nature and of most importance ecologically, are the arbuscular and ectomycorrhiza. An excellent review of all aspects of mycorrhizal biology can be found in Smith and Read (1997). Arbuscular mycorrhizae are formed by about 150 different species of fungi within the Glomeromycota and are mostly associated with herbaceous plants. The fungus enters the roots of plants where hyphae grow intercellularly. In addition, unique highly branched structures are formed within the cells of plant roots, called arbuscules. These are thought to be sites of nutrient exchange. Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi occur in all ecosystems of the world and associate with the roots of about 70% of all vascular plants (Hodge 2000). Ectomycorrhizal (ECM) fungi generally associate with woody plants. They are formed by about 5000 species of fungi, mainly from the Basidiomycotina, with some representatives from the Ascomycotina also. The fungus forms a sheath over the root tips and there is some intercellular, but no intracellular, growth of the hyphae. Ectomycorrhizae also have worldwide distributions, and although they associate with only about 3% of seed plants, their global importance is huge, as they associate with important timber and natural forest trees.

Essentially, arbuscular and ectomycorrhizae function in the same way.

Type
Chapter
Information
Ecological Communities
Plant Mediation in Indirect Interaction Webs
 , pp. 124 - 144
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Behmer, S. T., and Nes, W. D.. 2003. Insect sterol nutrition and physiology: a global overview. Advances in Insect Physiology 31:1–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borowicz, V. A. 1997. A fungal root symbiont modifies plant resistance to an insect herbivore. Oecologia 112:534–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borowicz, V. A. 2001. Do arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi alter plant–pathogen relations?Ecology 82:3057–3068.Google Scholar
Brown, V. K., and Gange, A. C.. 1990. Insect herbivory below ground. Advances in Ecological Research 20:1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, V. K., and A. C. Gange. 2002. Tritrophic below- and above-ground interactions in succession, pp. 197–222 in Tscharntke, T. and Hawkins, B. A. (eds.) Multitrophic Level Interactions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawley, M. J. 1987. Benevolent herbivores?Trends in Ecology and Evolution 2:167–168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cullings, K. W., Vogler, D. R., Parker, V. T., and Makhija, S.. 2001. Defoliation effects on the ectomycorrhizal community of a mixed Pinus contorta/Picea engelmannii stand in Yellowstone Park. Oecologia 127:533–539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Currie, A. F. 2004. Interactions between root-feeding insects and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Ph.D. dissertation, University of London, UK.
Del Vecchio, T. A., Gehring, C. A., Cobb, N. S., and Whitham, T. G.. 1993. Negative effects of scale insect herbivory on the ectomycorrhizae of juvenile pinyon pine. Ecology 74:2297–2302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, A. F. G. 1997. Aphid Ecology: An Optimization Approach. Glasgow, UK: Blackie.Google Scholar
Eom, A.-H., Wilson, G. W. T., and Hartnett, D. C.. 2001. Effects of ungulate grazers on arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and fungal community structure in tallgrass prairie. Mycologia 93:233–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontaine, J., Grandmougin-Ferjani, A., Hartmann, M. A., and Sancholle, M.. 2001. Sterol biosynthesis by the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices. Lipids 36:1357–1363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gange, A. C. 1996. Reduction in vine weevil larval growth by mycorrhizal fungi. Mitteilungen aus der Biologischen Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft 316:56–60.Google Scholar
Gange, A. C. 2000. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi, Collembola and plant growth. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15:369–372.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gange, A. C. 2001. Species-specific responses of a root- and shoot-feeding insect to arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of its host plant. New Phytologist 150:611–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gange, A. C., and E. Bower. 1997. Interactions between insects and mycorrhizal fungi, pp. 115–132 in Gange, A. C. and Brown, V. K. (eds.) Multitrophic Interactions in Terrestrial Systems. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Gange, A. C., and V. K. Brown. 2002a. Actions and interactions of soil invertebrates in affecting the structure of plant communities, pp. 321–344 in Heijden, M. G. A. and Sanders, I. R. (eds.) Mycorrhizal Ecology. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Gange, A. C., and Brown, V. K.. 2002b. Soil food web components affect plant community structure during early succession. Ecological Research 17:217–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gange, A. C., and Nice, H. E.. 1997. Performance of the thistle gall fly, Urophora cardui, in relation to host plant nitrogen and mycorrhizal colonization. New Phytologist 137:335–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gange, A. C., and West, H. M.. 1994. Interactions between arbuscular–mycorrhizal fungi and foliar-feeding insects in Plantago lanceolata L. New Phytologist 128:79–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gange, A. C., Brown, V. K., and Sinclair, G. S.. 1994. Reduction of black vine weevil growth by vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 70:115–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gange, A. C., Bower, E., and Brown, V. K.. 1999. Positive effects of an arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus on aphid life history traits. Oecologia 120:123–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gange, A. C., Bower, E., and Brown, V. K.. 2002a. Differential effects of insect herbivory on arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization. Oecologia 131:103–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gange, A. C., Stagg, P. G., and Ward, L. K.. 2002b. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi affect phytophagous insect specialism. Ecology Letters 5:11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gange, A. C., Brown, V. K., and Aplin, D. M.. 2003. Multitrophic links between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and insect parasitoids. Ecology Letters 6:1051–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gange, A. C., Gane, D. R. J., Chen, Y. L. and Gong, M. Q.. 2005. Dual colonization of Eucalyptus urophylla S. T. Blake by arbuscular and ectomycorrhizal fungi affects levels of insect herbivore attack. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 7:253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehring, C. A., and Whitham, T. G.. 1991. Herbivore-driven mycorrhizal mutualism in insect-susceptible pinyon pine. Nature 353:556–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehring, C. A., and Whitham, T. G.. 1994. Interactions between aboveground herbivores and the mycorrhizal mutualists of plants. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 9:251–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehring, C. A., and Whitham, T. G.. 1995. Duration of herbivore removal and environmental stress affect the ectomycorrhizae of pinyon pines. Ecology 76:2118–2123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehring, C. A., and T. G. Whitham. 2002. Mycorrhizae–herbivore interactions: population and community consequences, pp. 295–320 in Heijden, M. G. A. and Sanders, I. R. (eds.) Mycorrhizal Ecology. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Gehring, C. A., Cobb, N. S., and Whitham, T. G.. 1997. Three-way interactions among ectomycorrhizal mutualists, scale insects, and resistant and susceptible pinyon pines. American Naturalist 149:824–841.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goverde, M., Heijden, M. G. A., Wiemken, A., Sanders, I. R., and Erhardt, A.. 2000. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi influence life history traits of a lepidopteran herbivore. Oecologia 125:362–369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halldorsson, G., Sverrisson, H., Eyjolfsdottir, G. G., and Oddsdottir, E. S.. 2000. Ectomycorrhizae reduce damage to Russian larch by Otiorhynchus larvae. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 15:354–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, J. G., Zangerl, A. R., DeLucia, E. H., and Berenbaum, M. R.. 2001. The carbon-nutrient balance hypothesis: its rise and fall. Ecology Letters 4:86–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, M., and Klironomos, J. N.. 2002. Diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and ecosystem functioning, pp. 225–242 in Heijden, M. G. A. and Sanders, I. R. (eds.) Mycorrhizal Ecology. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Hause, B., Maier, W., Miersch, O., Kramell, R., and Strack, D.. 2002. Induction of jasmonate biosynthesis in arbuscular mycorrhizal barley roots. Plant Physiology 130:1213–1220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helgason, T., Fitter, A. H., and Young, J. P. W.. 1999. Molecular diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi colonising Hyacinthoides non-scripta (bluebell) in a seminatural woodland. Molecular Ecology 8:659–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodge, A. 2000. Microbial ecology of the arbuscular mycorrhiza. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 32:91–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, J. N., Weixin, C., and Crossley, D. A.. 1996. Herbivore-induced changes in plant carbon allocation: assessment of below-ground C fluxes using carbon-14. Oecologia 107:87–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, C. G., and F. T. Last. 1991. Ectomycorrhizae and trees: implications for aboveground herbivory, pp. 65–103 in Barbosa, P., Krischik, V. A., and Jones, C. G. (eds.) Microbial Mediation of Plant–Herbivore Interactions. Chichester, UK: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Kolb, T. E., Dodds, K. A., and Clancy, K. M.. 1999. Effect of western spruce budworm defoliation on the physiology and growth of potted Douglas-fir seedlings. Forest Science 45:280–291.Google Scholar
Krishna, K. R., Suresh, H. M., Syamsunder, J., and Bagyaraj, D. J.. 1981. Changes in the leaves of finger millet due to VA mycorrhizal infection. New Phytologist 87:717–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuikka, K., Härma, E., Markkola, A., et al. 2003. Severe defoliation of Scots pine reduces reproductive investment by ectomycorrhizal symbionts. Ecology 84:2051–2061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, D. J. 2000. Ecto- or arbuscular mycorrhizae: which are best?New Phytologist 146:353–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manninen, A.-M., Holopainen, T., and Holopainen, J. K.. 1998. Susceptibility of ectomycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) seedlings to a generalist insect herbivore, Lygus rugulipennis at two nitrogen availability levels. New Phytologist 140:55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, J. 2003. Artificial infection by endophytes affects growth and mycorrhizal colonization of Lolium perenne. Functional Plant Biology 30:419–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, N. D., Hatcher, P. E., and Taylor, J. E.. 2000. Coping with multiple enemies: an integration of molecular and ecological perspectives. Trends in Plant Science 5:220–225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Price, P. W. 1991. The plant vigor hypothesis and herbivore attack. Oikos 62:244–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabin, L. B., and Pacovsky, R. S.. 1985. Reduced larva growth of two lepidoptera (Noctuidae) on excised leaves of soybean infected with a mycorrhizal fungus. Journal of Economic Entomology 78:1358–1363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhoades, D. F. 1979. Evolution of plant chemical defense against herbivores, pp. 3–54 in Rosenthal, G. A. and Janzen, D. H. (eds.) Herbivores: Their Interaction with Secondary Plant Metabolites. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Rovira, A. D. 1969. Plant root exudates. Botanical Review 35:35–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saikkonen, K., Faeth, S. H., Helander, M., and Sullivan, T. J.. 1998. Fungal endophytes: a continuum of interactions with host plants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 29:319–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saikkonen, K., Ahonen-Jonnarth, U., Markkola, A., et al. 1999. Defoliation and mycorrhizal symbiosis: a functional balance between carbon sources and below-ground sinks. Ecology Letters 2:19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheu, S., Theenhaus, A., and Jones, T. H.. 1999. Links between the detrivore and the herbivore system: effects of earthworms and Collembola on plant growth and aphid development. Oecologia 119:541–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoonhoven, L. M., Jermy, T., and Loon, J. J. A.. 1998. Insect–Plant Biology: From Physiology to Evolution. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. E., and Read, D. J.. 1997. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Staddon, P. L., Fitter, A. H., and Robinson, D.. 1999. Effects of mycorrhizal colonization and elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide on carbon fixation and below-ground carbon partitioning in Plantago lanceolata. Journal of Experimental Botany 50:853–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strack, D., Fester, T., Hause, B., Schliemann, W., and Walter, M. H.. 2003. Arbuscular mycorrhiza: biological, chemical, and molecular aspects. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29:1955–1979.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thaler, J. S., Farag, M. A., Pare, P. W., and Dicke, M.. 2002. Jasmonate-deficient plants have reduced direct and indirect defences against insect herbivores. Ecology Letters 5:764–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tjallingii, W. F., and Esch, T. H.. 1993. Fine-structure of aphid stylet routes in plant tissues in correlation with EPG signals. Physiological Entomology 18:317–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heijden, M. G. A., Boller, T., Wiemken, A., and Sanders, I. R.. 1998. Different arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal species are potential determinants of plant community structure. Ecology 79:2082–2091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putten, W. H. 2003. Plant defense belowground and spatiotemporal processes in natural vegetation. Ecology 84:2269–2280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putten, W. H., Vet, L. E. M., Harvey, J. A., and Wäckers, F. L.. 2001. Linking above- and belowground multitrophic interactions of plants, herbivores, pathogens, and their antagonists. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:547–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vicari, M., Hatcher, P. E., and Ayres, P. G.. 2002. Combined effect of foliar and mycorrhizal endophytes on an insect herbivore. Ecology 83:2452–2464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wamberg, C., Christensen, S., and Jakobsen, I.. 2003. Interaction between foliar-feeding insects, mycorrhizal fungi, and rhizosphere protozoa on pea plants. Pedobiologia 47:281–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, T. C. R. 1984. The abundance of herbivores in relation to the availability of nitrogen in stressed food plants. Oecologia 63:90–105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wurst, S., Dugassa-Gobena, D., Langel, R., Bonkowski, M., and Scheu, S.. 2004. Combined effects of earthworms and vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizae on plant and aphid performance. New Phytologist 163:169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×