Object-Based Neglect: An Investigation of the Contributions of Eye Movements and Perceptual Completion
References (25)
- et al.
Break-down of perceptual awareness in unilateral neglect
Cortex
(1990) - et al.
Neglect of chimeric figures: two halves are better than a whole
Neuropsychologia
(1994) - et al.
Completion in visuo-spatial neglect: a case study
Cortex
(1994) Perceptual completion in patients with drawing neglect: eye-movement and tachistoscopic investigations
Neuropsychologia
(1995)Spatial limitation of eye movements during ocular exploration of simple line drawings in neglect syndrome
Cortex
(1994)Visual processing in cortically blind hemifields
Neuropsychologia
(1978)- et al.
Disentangling neglect and hemianopia
Neuropsychologia
(1991) - et al.
Object-based attentional mechanisms: Evidence from patients with unilateral neglect
- et al.
Filling in: why Dennett is wrong
Consciousness Explained
(1991)
Axis-based neglect of visual shapes
Neuropsychologia
Can visual neglect operate in object-centred coordinates? An affirmative single-case study
Cognitive Neuropsychology
Cited by (28)
Bilateral parietal dysfunctions and disconnections in simultanagnosia and Bálint syndrome
2018, Handbook of Clinical NeurologyCitation Excerpt :As Rafal (2001) argued, simultanagnosia represents constriction in visual attention, which is different in nature from the spatial biases characteristic of the syndrome of unilateral spatial neglect. Simultanagnosia differs also from object-based neglect, which on the one hand, like simultanagnosia, affects objects regardless of their spatial position, but on the other hand is still spatial in nature, and impinges on the contralesional side of individual objects (Walker and Young, 1996; Doricchi and Galati, 2000). Although it should be noted that, based on some recent studies, it could be suggested that the object-centered attentional deficits in both simultanagnosia and unilateral spatial neglect may share some neuroanatomic substrates ( Medina et al., 2009; Chechlacz et al., 2012a, b; for review, see Dalrymple et al., 2013).
The neural basis of the egocentric and allocentric spatial frame of reference
2007, Brain ResearchCitation Excerpt :Viewer- or body-related neglect indicates an impairment of the egocentric FoR (Beschin et al., 1997; Calvanio et al., 1987; Chokron and Imbert, 1995; Fujii et al., 1996; Heilman et al., 1983; Hillis et al., 1998; Karnath et al., 1991; Karnath and Fetter, 1995; Ladavas, 1987) whereas stimulus- or object-related neglect concerns the contralesional side of objects, independent of their position relative to the body. The latter indicates an impairment of the allocentric FoR (Caramazza and Hillis, 1990; Driver and Halligan, 1991; Hillis and Caramazza, 1991; Walker and Young, 1996; Young et al., 1992). Two recent studies show that in fact the two FoRs can be differentially affected in patients with unilateral neglect (Hillis and Rapp, 1998; Ota et al., 2003).
Form completion across a hemianopic boundary: Behindsight?
2006, NeuropsychologiaUsing the Saccadic Inhibition Paradigm to Investigate Saccadic Control in Reading
2003, The Mind's Eye: Cognitive and Applied Aspects of Eye Movement Research
- a
Dr. R. Walker, Department of Psychology, University of Durham, Durham DHI 3LE, England, U.K.
- b
Dr. A.W. Young, MCR Applied Psychology Unit, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge CB2 2EF, England, U.K.